docs: update reactive forms page (#35969)

PR Close #35969
This commit is contained in:
Judy Bogart
2020-03-04 16:40:56 -08:00
committed by Kara Erickson
parent 4374931b0e
commit 0075017b43
6 changed files with 210 additions and 213 deletions

View File

@ -30,7 +30,12 @@ export const formControlBinding: any = {
/**
* @description
* * Syncs a standalone `FormControl` instance to a form control element.
* Synchronizes a standalone `FormControl` instance to a form control element.
*
* Note that support for using the `ngModel` input property and `ngModelChange` event with reactive
* form directives was deprecated in Angular v6 and is scheduled for removal in
* a future version of Angular.
* For details, see [Deprecated features](guide/deprecations#ngmodel-with-reactive-forms).
*
* @see [Reactive Forms Guide](guide/reactive-forms)
* @see `FormControl`
@ -38,80 +43,10 @@ export const formControlBinding: any = {
*
* @usageNotes
*
* ### Registering a single form control
*
* The following examples shows how to register a standalone control and set its value.
* The following example shows how to register a standalone control and set its value.
*
* {@example forms/ts/simpleFormControl/simple_form_control_example.ts region='Component'}
*
* ### Use with ngModel
*
* Support for using the `ngModel` input property and `ngModelChange` event with reactive
* form directives has been deprecated in Angular v6 and will be removed in a future version
* of Angular.
*
* Now deprecated:
*
* ```html
* <input [formControl]="control" [(ngModel)]="value">
* ```
*
* ```ts
* this.value = 'some value';
* ```
*
* This has been deprecated for a few reasons. First, developers have found this pattern
* confusing. It seems like the actual `ngModel` directive is being used, but in fact it's
* an input/output property named `ngModel` on the reactive form directive that simply
* approximates (some of) its behavior. Specifically, it allows getting/setting the value
* and intercepting value events. However, some of `ngModel`'s other features - like
* delaying updates with`ngModelOptions` or exporting the directive - simply don't work,
* which has understandably caused some confusion.
*
* In addition, this pattern mixes template-driven and reactive forms strategies, which
* we generally don't recommend because it doesn't take advantage of the full benefits of
* either strategy. Setting the value in the template violates the template-agnostic
* principles behind reactive forms, whereas adding a `FormControl`/`FormGroup` layer in
* the class removes the convenience of defining forms in the template.
*
* To update your code before support is removed, you'll want to decide whether to stick
* with reactive form directives (and get/set values using reactive forms patterns) or
* switch over to template-driven directives.
*
* After (choice 1 - use reactive forms):
*
* ```html
* <input [formControl]="control">
* ```
*
* ```ts
* this.control.setValue('some value');
* ```
*
* After (choice 2 - use template-driven forms):
*
* ```html
* <input [(ngModel)]="value">
* ```
*
* ```ts
* this.value = 'some value';
* ```
*
* By default, when you use this pattern, you will see a deprecation warning once in dev
* mode. You can choose to silence this warning by providing a config for
* `ReactiveFormsModule` at import time:
*
* ```ts
* imports: [
* ReactiveFormsModule.withConfig({warnOnNgModelWithFormControl: 'never'});
* ]
* ```
*
* Alternatively, you can choose to surface a separate warning for each instance of this
* pattern with a config value of `"always"`. This may help to track down where in the code
* the pattern is being used as the code is being updated.
*
* @ngModule ReactiveFormsModule
* @publicApi
*/

View File

@ -50,77 +50,13 @@ export const controlNameBinding: any = {
* * Radio buttons: `RadioControlValueAccessor`
* * Selects: `SelectControlValueAccessor`
*
* ### Use with ngModel
* ### Use with ngModel is deprecated
*
* Support for using the `ngModel` input property and `ngModelChange` event with reactive
* form directives has been deprecated in Angular v6 and will be removed in a future
* version of Angular.
* form directives has been deprecated in Angular v6 and is scheduled for removal in
* a future version of Angular.
*
* Now deprecated:
*
* ```html
* <form [formGroup]="form">
* <input formControlName="first" [(ngModel)]="value">
* </form>
* ```
*
* ```ts
* this.value = 'some value';
* ```
*
* This has been deprecated for a few reasons. First, developers have found this pattern
* confusing. It seems like the actual `ngModel` directive is being used, but in fact it's
* an input/output property named `ngModel` on the reactive form directive that simply
* approximates (some of) its behavior. Specifically, it allows getting/setting the value
* and intercepting value events. However, some of `ngModel`'s other features - like
* delaying updates with `ngModelOptions` or exporting the directive - simply don't work,
* which has understandably caused some confusion.
*
* In addition, this pattern mixes template-driven and reactive forms strategies, which
* we generally don't recommend because it doesn't take advantage of the full benefits of
* either strategy. Setting the value in the template violates the template-agnostic
* principles behind reactive forms, whereas adding a `FormControl`/`FormGroup` layer in
* the class removes the convenience of defining forms in the template.
*
* To update your code before support is removed, you'll want to decide whether to stick with
* reactive form directives (and get/set values using reactive forms patterns) or switch over to
* template-driven directives.
*
* After (choice 1 - use reactive forms):
*
* ```html
* <form [formGroup]="form">
* <input formControlName="first">
* </form>
* ```
*
* ```ts
* this.form.get('first').setValue('some value');
* ```
*
* After (choice 2 - use template-driven forms):
*
* ```html
* <input [(ngModel)]="value">
* ```
*
* ```ts
* this.value = 'some value';
* ```
*
* By default, when you use this pattern, you will see a deprecation warning once in dev
* mode. You can choose to silence this warning by providing a config for
* `ReactiveFormsModule` at import time:
*
* ```ts
* imports: [
* ReactiveFormsModule.withConfig({warnOnNgModelWithFormControl: 'never'})
* ]
* ```
*
* Alternatively, you can choose to surface a separate warning for each instance of this
* pattern with a config value of `"always"`. This may help to track down where in the code
* the pattern is being used as the code is being updated.
* For details, see [Deprecated features](guide/deprecations#ngmodel-with-reactive-forms).
*
* @ngModule ReactiveFormsModule
* @publicApi

View File

@ -16,7 +16,8 @@ import {FormBuilder} from './form_builder';
* Exports the required providers and directives for template-driven forms,
* making them available for import by NgModules that import this module.
*
* @see [Forms Guide](/guide/forms)
* @see [Forms Overview](/guide/forms-overview)
* @see [Template-driven Forms Guide](/guide/forms)
*
* @publicApi
*/
@ -31,9 +32,9 @@ export class FormsModule {
/**
* Exports the required infrastructure and directives for reactive forms,
* making them available for import by NgModules that import this module.
* @see [Forms](guide/reactive-forms)
*
* @see [Reactive Forms Guide](/guide/reactive-forms)
* @see [Forms Overview](guide/forms-overview)
* @see [Reactive Forms Guide](guide/reactive-forms)
*
* @publicApi
*/

View File

@ -700,6 +700,7 @@ export abstract class AbstractControl {
* Calling `setErrors` also updates the validity of the parent control.
*
* @usageNotes
*
* ### Manually set the errors for a control
*
* ```
@ -935,7 +936,7 @@ export abstract class AbstractControl {
* This is one of the three fundamental building blocks of Angular forms, along with
* `FormGroup` and `FormArray`. It extends the `AbstractControl` class that
* implements most of the base functionality for accessing the value, validation status,
* user interactions and events.
* user interactions and events. See [usage examples below](#usage-notes).
*
* @see `AbstractControl`
* @see [Reactive Forms Guide](guide/reactive-forms)