fix(ivy): allow abstract directives to have an invalid constructor (#32987)

For abstract directives, i.e. directives without a selector, it may
happen that their constructor is called explicitly from a subclass,
hence its parameters are not required to be valid for Angular's DI
purposes. Prior to this commit however, having an abstract directive
with a constructor that has parameters that are not eligible for
Angular's DI would produce a compilation error.

A similar scenario may occur for `@Injectable`s, where an explicit
`use*` definition allows for the constructor to be irrelevant. For
example, the situation where `useFactory` is specified allows for the
constructor to be called explicitly with any value, so its constructor
parameters are not required to be valid. For `@Injectable`s this is
handled by generating a DI factory function that throws.

This commit implements the same solution for abstract directives, such
that a compilation error is avoided while still producing an error at
runtime if the type is instantiated implicitly by Angular's DI
mechanism.

Fixes #32981

PR Close #32987
This commit is contained in:
JoostK
2019-10-03 21:54:49 +02:00
committed by Andrew Kushnir
parent e4e8dbdee0
commit 8d15bfa6ee
28 changed files with 307 additions and 117 deletions

View File

@ -41,7 +41,7 @@ export interface R3DirectiveMetadata {
/**
* Dependencies of the directive's constructor.
*/
deps: R3DependencyMetadata[]|null;
deps: R3DependencyMetadata[]|'invalid'|null;
/**
* Unparsed selector of the directive, or `null` if there was no selector.