fix(ivy): allow abstract directives to have an invalid constructor (#32987)
For abstract directives, i.e. directives without a selector, it may happen that their constructor is called explicitly from a subclass, hence its parameters are not required to be valid for Angular's DI purposes. Prior to this commit however, having an abstract directive with a constructor that has parameters that are not eligible for Angular's DI would produce a compilation error. A similar scenario may occur for `@Injectable`s, where an explicit `use*` definition allows for the constructor to be irrelevant. For example, the situation where `useFactory` is specified allows for the constructor to be called explicitly with any value, so its constructor parameters are not required to be valid. For `@Injectable`s this is handled by generating a DI factory function that throws. This commit implements the same solution for abstract directives, such that a compilation error is avoided while still producing an error at runtime if the type is instantiated implicitly by Angular's DI mechanism. Fixes #32981 PR Close #32987
This commit is contained in:
@ -41,7 +41,7 @@ export interface R3DirectiveMetadata {
|
||||
/**
|
||||
* Dependencies of the directive's constructor.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
deps: R3DependencyMetadata[]|null;
|
||||
deps: R3DependencyMetadata[]|'invalid'|null;
|
||||
|
||||
/**
|
||||
* Unparsed selector of the directive, or `null` if there was no selector.
|
||||
|
Reference in New Issue
Block a user