NOTE: This change must be reverted with previous deletes so that it code remains in build-able state.
This change deletes old styling code and replaces it with a simplified styling algorithm.
The mental model for the new algorithm is:
- Create a linked list of styling bindings in the order of priority. All styling bindings ere executed in compiled order and than a linked list of bindings is created in priority order.
- Flush the style bindings at the end of `advance()` instruction. This implies that there are two flush events. One at the end of template `advance` instruction in the template. Second one at the end of `hostBindings` `advance` instruction when processing host bindings (if any).
- Each binding instructions effectively updates the string to represent the string at that location. Because most of the bindings are additive, this is a cheap strategy in most cases. In rare cases the strategy requires removing tokens from the styling up to this point. (We expect that to be rare case)S Because, the bindings are presorted in the order of priority, it is safe to resume the processing of the concatenated string from the last change binding.
PR Close#34616
Prior to this change, the ExpressionChangedAfterChecked error thrown in Ivy was missing useful information that was available in View Engine, specifically: missing property name for proprty bindings and also the content of the entire property interpolation (only a changed value was displayed) if one of expressions was changed unexpectedly. This commit improves the error message by including the mentioned information into the error text.
PR Close#34381
This commit drops our custom, change-detection specific, equality comparison util
in favour of the standard Object.is which has desired semantics.
There are multiple advantages of this approach:
- less code to maintain on our end;
- avoid NaN checks if both values are equal;
- re-write NaN checks so we don't trigger V8 deoptimizations.
PR Close#32212
ivy's bindingUpdated instruction is using the assertNotEqual check to make
sure that NO_CHANGE value (of type Object) is not passed as a value to be
dirty-checked. In practice it means that any value passed as a binding
value would be compared to the NO_CHANGE object.
It turns out that the assertNotEqual is using == and given
that binding values are of different type and we always compare it to the
NO_CHANGE object we were doing lots of type coercion. It resulted in calls
to expensive types conversions and calls to Object.toString().
A profiler reported ~15% of the self time spent in the assertNotEqual
but it turns out that removing type coercion speeds up Material Chips with
input scenario much more (~40ms down to ~20ms).
This PR introduces new assert method `assertNotSame` that uses strict equality
check. The new assertion is used in binding instructions to compare to
NO_CHANGE object reference.
PR Close#29470
This fix corrects a bug where we were passing a binding _value_
in place of an expected binding index. This reulted in the binding
value being compared to an array length and buggy type coercion.
Fixing this bug speeds up test scenario by ~10-15%.
PR Close#29476
Google3 detected circular references here, so splitting up this rather hodge-podge list of functions into slightly better organizational units.
PR Close#28382
This commit unifies handling of the "check no changes" mode between
ngIvy and the view engine. More specifically:
- check no changes can be invoked before change detection in ivy;
- `undefined` values are considered equal `NO_CHANGES` for the "check no changes"
mode purposes.
Chanes in this commit enables several tests that were previously running only in ivy
or only in the view engine.
PR Close#28366
Prior to this commit, we had two different modes for change detection
execution for Ivy, depending on whether you called `bootstrap()` or
`renderComponent()`. In the former case, we would complete creation
mode for all components in the tree before beginning update mode for
any component. In the latter case, we would run creation mode and
update mode together for each component individually.
Maintaining code to support these two different execution orders was
unnecessarily complex, so this commit aligns the two bootstrapping
mechanisms to execute in the same order. Now creation mode always
runs for all components before update mode begins.
This change also simplifies our rendering logic so that we use
`LView` flags as the source of truth for rendering mode instead of
`rf` function arguments. This fixed some related bugs (e.g. calling
`ViewRef.detectChanges` synchronously after the view's creation
would create view nodes twice, view queries would execute twice, etc).
PR Close#27744
