Previously, the transitive scopes of an NgModuleDef were computed
during execution of the @NgModule decorator. This meant that JIT-
compiled modules could only import other JIT-compiled modules, as
the import mechanism relied on the calculation of transitive scopes
to already have happened for the imported module.
This change moves computation of transitive scopes to a function
`transitiveScopesFor` (and makes it lazy). This opens the door for
AOT -> JIT or JIT -> AOT imports, as transitive scopes for AOT
modules can be calculated when needed by JIT, and AOT modules can
also write expressions that call `transitiveScopesFor` when
importing a JIT-compiled module.
PR Close#24334
This PR tackles a simple case where ViewRef definition point (<ng-template>) is the
same as the insertion point (ViewContainerRef requested on the said <ng-template>).
For this particular case we can assume that we know a container into which a given
view will be inserted when a view is created. This is not true fall all the possible
cases so follow-up PR will be needed to extend this basic implementation.
PR Close#24179
This commit builds out enough of the JIT compiler to render
//packages/core/test/bundling/todo, and allows the tests to run in
JIT mode.
To play with the app, run:
bazel run --define=compile=jit //packages/core/test/bundling/todo:prodserver
PR Close#24138
In ngIvy directives matching (determining which directives are active based
on a CSS seletor) happens at runtime. This means that runtime needs to have
enough context to match directives. This PR takes care of cases where a directive's
selector should match bindings (ex. [foo]="exp") and event handlers (ex. (out)="do()").
In the mentioned cases we need to have binding / output "attributes" for directive's
CSS selector matching purposes. At the same time those are not regular attributes and
as such should not be reflected in the DOM.
Closes#23706
PR Close#23991
Short-circuitable expressions (using ternary & binary operators) could not use
the regular binding mechanism as it relies on the bindings being checked every
single time - the index is incremented as part of checking the bindings.
Then for pure function kind of bindings we use a different mechanism with a
fixed index. As such short circuiting a binding check does not mess with the
expected binding index.
Note that all pure function bindings are handled the same wether or not they
actually are short-circuitable. This allows to keep the compiler and compiled
code simple - and there is no runtime perf cost anyway.
PR Close#24039
