In 420b9be1c14ec6900692b641a3d89b99eb9c6e5b all style-based sanitization code was
disabled because modern browsers no longer allow for javascript expressions within
CSS. This patch is a follow-up patch which removes all traces of style sanitization
code (both instructions and runtime logic) for the `[style]` and `[style.prop]` bindings.
PR Close#36965
Before this change `[class]` and `[className]` were both converted into `ɵɵclassMap`. The implication of this is that at runtime we could not differentiate between the two and as a result we treated `@Input('class')` and `@Input('className)` as equivalent.
This change makes `[class]` and `[className]` distinct. The implication of this is that `[class]` becomes `ɵɵclassMap` instruction but `[className]` becomes `ɵɵproperty' instruction. This means that `[className]` will no longer participate in styling and will overwrite the DOM `class` value.
Fix#35577
PR Close#35668
We had some logic for generating and passing in the `elIndex` parameter into the `hostBindings` function, but it wasn't actually being used for anything. The only place left that had a reference to it was the `StylingBuilder` and it only stored it without referencing it again.
PR Close#34969
NOTE: This change must be reverted with previous deletes so that it code remains in build-able state.
This change deletes old styling code and replaces it with a simplified styling algorithm.
The mental model for the new algorithm is:
- Create a linked list of styling bindings in the order of priority. All styling bindings ere executed in compiled order and than a linked list of bindings is created in priority order.
- Flush the style bindings at the end of `advance()` instruction. This implies that there are two flush events. One at the end of template `advance` instruction in the template. Second one at the end of `hostBindings` `advance` instruction when processing host bindings (if any).
- Each binding instructions effectively updates the string to represent the string at that location. Because most of the bindings are additive, this is a cheap strategy in most cases. In rare cases the strategy requires removing tokens from the styling up to this point. (We expect that to be rare case)S Because, the bindings are presorted in the order of priority, it is safe to resume the processing of the concatenated string from the last change binding.
PR Close#34616
Compiler keeps track of number of slots (`vars`) which are needed for binding instructions. Normally each binding instructions allocates a single slot in the `LView` but styling instructions need to allocate two slots.
PR Close#34616
This change moves information from instructions to declarative position:
- `ɵɵallocHostVars(vars)` => `DirectiveDef.hostVars`
- `ɵɵelementHostAttrs(attrs)` => `DirectiveDef.hostAttrs`
When merging directives it is necessary to know about `hostVars` and `hostAttrs`. Before this change the information was stored in the `hostBindings` function. This was problematic, because in order to get to the information the `hostBindings` would have to be executed. In order for `hostBindings` to be executed the directives would have to be instantiated. This means that the directive instantiation would happen before we had knowledge about the `hostAttrs` and as a result the directive could observe in the constructor that not all of the `hostAttrs` have been applied. This further complicates the runtime as we have to apply `hostAttrs` in parts over many invocations.
`ɵɵallocHostVars` was unnecessarily complicated because it would have to update the `LView` (and Blueprint) while existing directives are already executing. By moving it out of `hostBindings` function we can access it statically and we can create correct `LView` (and Blueprint) in a single pass.
This change only changes how the instructions are generated, but does not change the runtime much. (We cheat by emulating the old behavior by calling `ɵɵallocHostVars` and `ɵɵelementHostAttrs`) Subsequent change will refactor the runtime to take advantage of the static information.
PR Close#34683
This patch removes the need for the styleSanitizer() instruction in
favor of passing the sanitizer into directly into the styleProp
instruction.
This patch also increases the binding index size for all style/class bindings in preparation for #34418
PR Close#34480
Adds support for chaining of `styleProp`, `classProp` and `stylePropInterpolateX` instructions whenever possible which should help generate less code. Note that one complication here is for `stylePropInterpolateX` instructions where we have to break into multiple chains if there are other styling instructions inbetween the interpolations which helps maintain the execution order.
PR Close#33837
This patch ensures that the `[style]` and `[class]` based bindings
are directly applied to an element's style and className attributes.
This patch optimizes the algorithm so that it...
- Doesn't construct an update an instance of `StylingMapArray` for
`[style]` and `[class]` bindings
- Doesn't apply `[style]` and `[class]` based entries using
`classList` and `style` (direct attributes are used instead)
- Doesn't split or iterate over all string-based tokens in a
string value obtained from a `[class]` binding.
This patch speeds up the following cases:
- `<div [class]>` and `<div class="..." [class]>`
- `<div [style]>` and `<div style="..." [style]>`
The overall speec increase is by over 5x.
PR Close#33336
Prior to this commit, all `className` inputs were not set because the runtime code assumed that the `classMap` instruction is only generated for `[class]` bindings. However the `[className]` binding also produces the same `classMap`, thus the code needs to distinguish between `class` and `className`. This commit adds extra logic to select the right input name and also throws an error in case `[class]` and `[className]` bindings are used on the same element simultaneously.
PR Close#33188
This patch is a final major refactor in styling Angular.
This PR includes three main fixes:
All temporary state taht is persisted between template style/class application
and style/class application in host bindings is now removed.
Removes the styling() and stylingApply() instructions.
Introduces a "direct apply" mode that is used apply prop-based
style/class in the event that there are no map-based bindings as
well as property collisions.
PR Close#32259
PR Close#32591
This patch is a final major refactor in styling Angular.
This PR includes three main fixes:
All temporary state taht is persisted between template style/class application
and style/class application in host bindings is now removed.
Removes the styling() and stylingApply() instructions.
Introduces a "direct apply" mode that is used apply prop-based
style/class in the event that there are no map-based bindings as
well as property collisions.
PR Close#32259
PR Close#32596
This patch is a final major refactor in styling Angular.
This PR includes three main fixes:
All temporary state taht is persisted between template style/class application
and style/class application in host bindings is now removed.
Removes the styling() and stylingApply() instructions.
Introduces a "direct apply" mode that is used apply prop-based
style/class in the event that there are no map-based bindings as
well as property collisions.
PR Close#32259
This commit is the final patch of the ivy styling algorithm refactor.
This patch swaps functionality from the old styling mechanism to the
new refactored code by changing the instruction code the compiler
generates and by pointing the runtime instruction code to the new
styling algorithm.
PR Close#30742
Adds the new `classMapInterpolate1` through `classMapInterpolate8` instructions which handle interpolations inside the `class` attribute and moves the interpolation logic internally. This allows us to remove the `interpolationX` instructions in a follow-up PR.
These changes also add an error if an interpolation is encountered inside a `style` tag (e.g. `style="width: {{value}}"`). Up until now this would actually generate valid instructions, because `styleMap` goes through the same code path as `classMap` which does support interpolation. At runtime, however, `styleMap` would set invalid styles that look like `<div style="0:w;1:i;2:d;3:t;4:h;5::;7:1;">`. In `ViewEngine` interpolations inside `style` weren't supported either, however there we'd output invalid styles like `<div style="unsafe">`, even if the content was trusted.
PR Close#31211
This patch is one of the final patches to refactor the styling algorithm
to be more efficient, performant and less complex.
This patch enables sanitization support for map-based and prop-based
style bindings.
PR Close#30667
This patch in the second runtime change which refactors how styling
bindings work in Angular. This patch refactors how map-based
`[style]` and `[class]` bindings work using a new algorithm which
is faster and less complex than the former one.
This patch is a follow-up to an earlier refactor which enabled
support for prop-based `[style.name]` and `[class.name]`
bindings (see f03475cac8bbc79aaf13caf94b099b0c234028bc).
PR Close#30543
This is the first refactor PR designed to change how styling bindings
(i.e. `[style]` and `[class]`) behave in Ivy. Instead of having a heavy
element-by-element context be generated for each element, this new
refactor aims to use a single context for each `tNode` element that is
examined and iterated over when styling values are to be applied to the
element.
This patch brings this new functionality to prop-based bindings such as
`[style.prop]` and `[class.name]`.
PR Close#30469
This is the final patch to migrate the Angular styling code to have a
smaller instruction set in preparation for the runtime refactor. All
styling-related instructions now work both in template and hostBindings
functions and do not use `element` as a prefix for their names:
BEFORE:
elementStyling()
elementStyleProp()
elementClassProp()
elementStyleMap()
elementClassMap()
elementStylingApply()
AFTER:
styling()
styleProp()
classProp()
styleMap()
classMap()
stylingApply()
PR Close#30318
This patch removes all host-specific styling instructions in favor of
using element-level instructions instead. Because of the previous
patches that made sure `select(n)` worked between styling calls, all
host level instructions are not needed anymore. This patch changes each
of those instruction calls to use any of the `elementStyling*`,
`elementStyle*` and `elementClass*` styling instructions instead.
PR Close#30336
Fixes not being able to bind a `SafeStyle` as a camel cased style property (e.g. `[style.backgroundImage]="someSafeStyle"`). The issue was due to the fact that we only check the dash case property names to determine whether to sanitize a value.
This PR resolves FW-1279.
PR Close#30328
This patch is one commit of many patches that will unify all styling instructions
across both template-level bindings and host-level bindings. This patch in particular
removes the `elementIndex` param because it is already set prior to each styling
instruction via the `select(n)` instruction.
PR Close#30313
This patch breaks up the existing `elementStylingMap` into
`elementClassMap` and `elementStyleMap` instructions. It also breaks
apart `hostStlyingMap` into `hostClassMap` and `hostStyleMap`
instructions. This change allows for better tree-shaking and reduces
the complexity of the styling algorithm code for `[style]` and `[class]`
bindings.
PR Close#30293
Fixes Ivy throwing an error because it tries to generate styling instructions for empty `style` and `class` bindings.
This PR resolves FW-1274.
PR Close#30024
This patch is the first of a few patches which separates the
styling logic between template bindings (e.g. <div [style])
from host bindings (e.g. @HostBinding('style')). This patch
in particular introduces a series of host-specific styling
instructions and changes the existing set of template styling
instructions not to accept directives. The underyling code (which
communicates with the styling algorithm) still works as it did
before.
This PR also separates the styling instruction code into a separate
file and moves over all other instructions into an dedicated
instructions directory.
PR Close#29292
In the @Component decorator, the 'host' field is an object which represents
host bindings. The type of this field is complex, but is generally of the
form {[key: string]: string}. Several different kinds of bindings can be
specified, depending on the structure of the key.
For example:
```
@Component({
host: {'[prop]': 'someExpr'}
})
```
will bind an expression 'someExpr' to the property 'prop'. This is known to
be a property binding because of the square brackets in the binding key.
If the binding key is a plain string (no brackets or parentheses), then it
is known as an attribute binding. In this case, the right-hand side is not
interpreted as an expression, but is instead a constant string.
There is no actual requirement that at build time, these constant strings
are known to the compiler, but this was previously enforced as a side effect
of requiring the binding expressions for property and event bindings to be
statically known (as they need to be parsed). This commit breaks that
relationship and allows the attribute bindings to be dynamic. In the case
that they are dynamic, the references to the dynamic values are reflected
into the Ivy instructions for attribute bindings.
PR Close#29033
Up until now, `[style]` and `[class]` bindings (the map-based ones) have only
worked as template bindings and have not been supported at all inside of host
bindings. This patch ensures that multiple host binding sources (components and
directives) all properly assign style values and merge them correctly in terms
of priority.
Jira: FW-882
PR Close#28246
With the refactoring or how styles/classes are implmented in Ivy,
interpolation has caused the binding code to mess up since interpolation
itself takes up its own slot in Ivy's memory management code. This patch
makes sure that interpolation works as expected with class and style
bindings.
Jira issue: FW-944
PR Close#28190
Up until this point, all static attribute values (things like `title` and `id`)
defined within the `host` are of a Component/Directive definition were
generated into a `def.attributes` array and then processed at runtime.
This design decision does not lend itself well to tree-shaking and is
inconsistent with other static values such as styles and classes.
This fix ensures that all static attribute values (attributes, classes,
and styles) that exist within a host definition for components and
directives are all assigned via the `elementHostAttrs` instruction.
```
// before
defineDirective({
...
attributes: ['title', 'my title']
...
})
//now
defineDirective({
...
hostBindings: function() {
if (create) {
elementHostAttrs(..., ['title', 'my-title']);
}
...
}
...
})
```
PR Close#28089
