- Removes `@publicApi` annotation from ivy instructions
- Adds new `@codeGenApi` annotation to ivy instructions
- Updates ts_api_guardian to support the new annotation properly
PR Close#29820
The new styling algorithm in angular is designed to evaluate host
bindings stylinh priority in order of directive evaluation order. This,
however, does not work with respect to parent/sub-class directives
because sub-class host bindings are run after the parent host bindings
but still have priority. This patch ensures that the host styling bindings
for parent and sub-class components/directives are executed with respect
to the styling algorithm prioritization.
Jira Issue: FW-1132
PR Close#29602
- moves all publicly exported instructions to their own files
- refactors namespace instructions to set state in `state.ts`
- no longer exports * from `instructions.ts`.
- `instructions.ts` renamed to `shared.ts` (old `shared.ts` contents folded in to `instructions.ts`)
- updates `all.ts` to re-export from public instruction files.
PR Close#29646
- Adds `property` instruction
- Does _NOT_ add compiler changes to accommodate `property` instruction, that will be a follow up PR.
- Updates `select` instruction to set the selected index in state.
- Adds dev mode assertions around the selected index state.
Related #29527
PR Close#29513
- Adds `property` instruction
- Does _NOT_ add compiler changes to accommodate `property` instruction, that will be a follow up PR.
- Updates `select` instruction to set the selected index in state.
- Adds dev mode assertions around the selected index state.
Related #29527
PR Close#29513
This patch is the first of a few patches which separates the
styling logic between template bindings (e.g. <div [style])
from host bindings (e.g. @HostBinding('style')). This patch
in particular introduces a series of host-specific styling
instructions and changes the existing set of template styling
instructions not to accept directives. The underyling code (which
communicates with the styling algorithm) still works as it did
before.
This PR also separates the styling instruction code into a separate
file and moves over all other instructions into an dedicated
instructions directory.
PR Close#29292
- Removes CONTAINER_INDEX
- LView[PARENT] now contains LContainer when necessary
- Removes now unused arguments to methods after refactor
PR Close#28382
`LView` `HOST` was set in most cases right after creating `LView`.
This makes the API cleaner by explicitly passing it ont `createLView`.
PR Close#28461
Prior to this change contentQueriesRefresh functions that represent refresh logic for @ContentQuery list were not composable, which caused problems in case one Directive inherits another one and both of them contain Content Queries. Due to the fact that we used indices to reference queries in refresh function, results were placed into wrong Queries. In order to avoid that we no longer use indices to reference queries and instead maintain current content query index while iterating through them. This allows us to compose contentQueriesRefresh functions and make inheritance feature work with Content Queries.
PR Close#28324
Prior to this change `viewQuery` functions that represent @ViewQuery list were not composable, which caused problems in case one Component/Directive inherits another one and both of them contain View Queries. Due to the fact that we used indices to reference queries, resulting query set was corrupted (child component queries were overridden by super class ones). In order to avoid that we no longer use indices assigned at compile time and instead maintain current view query index while iterating through them. This allows us to compose `viewQuery` functions and make inheritance feature work with View Queries.
PR Close#28309
When requesting a queries instance for a node, it was previously
decided whether it needs to be cloned if the node was not already marked
as hosting a query. This check is in place to have only a single queries
instance per node.
The issue with this approach is that no clone is created for subsequent
instantiations of a component, as the TNode is already marked as hosting
a query during first template pass, whereas the cloning of queries
should be independent of first template pass.
To overcome this issue, the queries are assigned an owner TNode such
that it can reliably be determined if a clone needs to be created.
PR Close#27892
Prior to this commit, we had two different modes for change detection
execution for Ivy, depending on whether you called `bootstrap()` or
`renderComponent()`. In the former case, we would complete creation
mode for all components in the tree before beginning update mode for
any component. In the latter case, we would run creation mode and
update mode together for each component individually.
Maintaining code to support these two different execution orders was
unnecessarily complex, so this commit aligns the two bootstrapping
mechanisms to execute in the same order. Now creation mode always
runs for all components before update mode begins.
This change also simplifies our rendering logic so that we use
`LView` flags as the source of truth for rendering mode instead of
`rf` function arguments. This fixed some related bugs (e.g. calling
`ViewRef.detectChanges` synchronously after the view's creation
would create view nodes twice, view queries would execute twice, etc).
PR Close#27744
BREAKING CHANGE:
The public API for `DebugNode` was accidentally too broad. This change removes
1. Public constructor. Since `DebugNode` is a way for Angular to communicate information
on to the developer there is no reason why the developer should ever need to
Instantiate the `DebugNode`
2. We are also removing `removeChild`, `addChild`, `insertBefore`, and `insertChildAfter`.
All of these methods are used by Angular to constructor the correct `DebugNode` tree.
There is no reason why the developer should ever be constructing a `DebugNode` tree
And these methods should have never been made public.
3. All properties have been change to `readonly` since `DebugNode` is used by Angular
to communicate to developer and there is no reason why these APIs should be writable.
While technically breaking change we don’t expect anyone to be effected by this change.
PR Close#27223
