Turns out that writing to global state is more expensive than writing to
a property on an object.
Slower:
````
let count = 0;
function increment() {
count++;
}
```
Faster:
````
const state = {
count: 0
};
function increment() {
state.count++;
}
```
This change moves all of the instruction state into a single state object.
`noop_change_detection` benchmark
Pre refactoring: 16.7 us
Post refactoring: 14.523 us (-13.3%)
PR Close#33093
Prior to this patch, if a map-class binding is applied directly then
that value will be incorrectly provided a sanitizer even if there is no
sanitization present for an element.
PR Close#33154
Prior to this patch, each time `advance()` would run (or when a
templateFn or hostBindings code exits) then the core change detection
code would check to see whether the styling data needs to be reset. This
patch removes that functionality and places everything inside of the
scheduled styling exit function. This means that each time one or more
styling bindings run (even if the value hasn't changed) then an exit
function will be scheduled and that will do all the cleanup.
PR Close#32591
This patch is a final major refactor in styling Angular.
This PR includes three main fixes:
All temporary state taht is persisted between template style/class application
and style/class application in host bindings is now removed.
Removes the styling() and stylingApply() instructions.
Introduces a "direct apply" mode that is used apply prop-based
style/class in the event that there are no map-based bindings as
well as property collisions.
PR Close#32259
PR Close#32591
This patch is a final major refactor in styling Angular.
This PR includes three main fixes:
All temporary state taht is persisted between template style/class application
and style/class application in host bindings is now removed.
Removes the styling() and stylingApply() instructions.
Introduces a "direct apply" mode that is used apply prop-based
style/class in the event that there are no map-based bindings as
well as property collisions.
PR Close#32259
PR Close#32596
This patch is a final major refactor in styling Angular.
This PR includes three main fixes:
All temporary state taht is persisted between template style/class application
and style/class application in host bindings is now removed.
Removes the styling() and stylingApply() instructions.
Introduces a "direct apply" mode that is used apply prop-based
style/class in the event that there are no map-based bindings as
well as property collisions.
PR Close#32259
After a series of recent refactorings `enterView` and `leaveView` became
identical. This PR merges both into one concept of view selectio (similar
to a node selection). This reduces number of concepts and code size.
PR Close#32263
This commit removes all the (duplicated) logic of setting lView[BINDING_INDEX]
from `enterView`. `enterView` is on the critcal path perf-wise so we should
avoid having any logic in there and minimise memory read / write.
This simple refactoring in this PR reduces time spent in noop change detection
by ~12% (from ~800ms down to ~700ms on a local machine where measurements were
taken).
PR Close#32263
In the previous patch () all the existing styling code was turned
off in favor of using the new refactored ivy styling code. This
patch is a follow up patch to that and removes all old, unused
styling code from the render3 directory.
PR Close#31193
This commit is the final patch of the ivy styling algorithm refactor.
This patch swaps functionality from the old styling mechanism to the
new refactored code by changing the instruction code the compiler
generates and by pointing the runtime instruction code to the new
styling algorithm.
PR Close#30742
Currently in Ivy whenever we encounter a new namespace, we set it in the global state so that all subsequent nodes are created under the same namespace. Next time a template is run the namespace will be reset back to HTML.
This breaks down if the last node that was rendered was under the SVG or MathML namespace and we create a component through `ViewContainerRef.create`, because the next template function hasn't run yet and it hasn't had the chance to update the namespace. The result is that the root node of the new component will retain the wrong namespace and may not end up rendering at all (e.g. if we're trying to show a `div` inside the SVG namespace). This issue has the potential to affect a lot of apps, because all components inserted through the router also go through `ViewContainerRef.create`.
PR Close#31232
The Angular runtime frequently calls into user code (for example, when
writing to a property binding). Since user code can throw errors, calls to
it are frequently wrapped in a try-finally block. In Ivy, the following
pattern is common:
```typescript
enterView();
try {
callUserCode();
} finally {
leaveView();
}
```
This has a significant problem, however: `leaveView` has a side effect: it
calls any pending lifecycle hooks that might've been scheduled during the
current round of change detection. Generally it's a bad idea to run
lifecycle hooks after the application has crashed. The application is in an
inconsistent state - directives may not be instantiated fully, queries may
not be resolved, bindings may not have been applied, etc. Invariants that
the app code relies upon may not hold. Further crashes or broken behavior
are likely.
Frequently, lifecycle hooks are used to make assertions about these
invariants. When these assertions fail, they will throw and "swallow" the
original error, making debugging of the problem much more difficult.
This commit modifies `leaveView` to understand whether the application is
currently crashing, via a parameter `safeToRunHooks`. This parameter is set
by modifying the above pattern:
```typescript
enterView();
let safeToRunHooks = false;
try {
callUserCode();
safeToRunHooks = true;
} finally {
leaveView(..., safeToRunHooks);
}
```
If `callUserCode` crashes, then `safeToRunHooks` will never be set to `true`
and `leaveView` won't call any further user code. The original error will
then propagate back up the stack and be reported correctly. A test is added
to verify this behavior.
PR Close#31244
There is an encoding issue with using delta `Δ`, where the browser will attempt to detect the file encoding if the character set is not explicitly declared on a `<script/>` tag, and Chrome will find the `Δ` character and decide it is window-1252 encoding, which misinterprets the `Δ` character to be some other character that is not a valid JS identifier character
So back to the frog eyes we go.
```
__
/ɵɵ\
( -- ) - I am ineffable. I am forever.
_/ \_
/ \ / \
== == ==
```
PR Close#30546
This is the first refactor PR designed to change how styling bindings
(i.e. `[style]` and `[class]`) behave in Ivy. Instead of having a heavy
element-by-element context be generated for each element, this new
refactor aims to use a single context for each `tNode` element that is
examined and iterated over when styling values are to be applied to the
element.
This patch brings this new functionality to prop-based bindings such as
`[style.prop]` and `[class.name]`.
PR Close#30469
This patch removes all host-specific styling instructions in favor of
using element-level instructions instead. Because of the previous
patches that made sure `select(n)` worked between styling calls, all
host level instructions are not needed anymore. This patch changes each
of those instruction calls to use any of the `elementStyling*`,
`elementStyle*` and `elementClass*` styling instructions instead.
PR Close#30336
Because the styling context may be stored in a different location
and be apart of a sub array, reading the styling context each time
a host binding is evaluated is costly. This patch ensures that the
active styling context is cached so that multiple interactions with
styling bindings can easily retrieve the styling context efficiently.
PR Close#29818
The `Δ` caused issue with other infrastructure, and we are temporarily
changing it to `ɵɵ`.
This commit also patches ts_api_guardian_test and AIO to understand `ɵɵ`.
PR Close#29850
- Removes `@publicApi` annotation from ivy instructions
- Adds new `@codeGenApi` annotation to ivy instructions
- Updates ts_api_guardian to support the new annotation properly
PR Close#29820
The new styling algorithm in angular is designed to evaluate host
bindings stylinh priority in order of directive evaluation order. This,
however, does not work with respect to parent/sub-class directives
because sub-class host bindings are run after the parent host bindings
but still have priority. This patch ensures that the host styling bindings
for parent and sub-class components/directives are executed with respect
to the styling algorithm prioritization.
Jira Issue: FW-1132
PR Close#29602
- moves all publicly exported instructions to their own files
- refactors namespace instructions to set state in `state.ts`
- no longer exports * from `instructions.ts`.
- `instructions.ts` renamed to `shared.ts` (old `shared.ts` contents folded in to `instructions.ts`)
- updates `all.ts` to re-export from public instruction files.
PR Close#29646
- Adds `property` instruction
- Does _NOT_ add compiler changes to accommodate `property` instruction, that will be a follow up PR.
- Updates `select` instruction to set the selected index in state.
- Adds dev mode assertions around the selected index state.
Related #29527
PR Close#29513
- Adds `property` instruction
- Does _NOT_ add compiler changes to accommodate `property` instruction, that will be a follow up PR.
- Updates `select` instruction to set the selected index in state.
- Adds dev mode assertions around the selected index state.
Related #29527
PR Close#29513
This patch is the first of a few patches which separates the
styling logic between template bindings (e.g. <div [style])
from host bindings (e.g. @HostBinding('style')). This patch
in particular introduces a series of host-specific styling
instructions and changes the existing set of template styling
instructions not to accept directives. The underyling code (which
communicates with the styling algorithm) still works as it did
before.
This PR also separates the styling instruction code into a separate
file and moves over all other instructions into an dedicated
instructions directory.
PR Close#29292
- Removes CONTAINER_INDEX
- LView[PARENT] now contains LContainer when necessary
- Removes now unused arguments to methods after refactor
PR Close#28382
`LView` `HOST` was set in most cases right after creating `LView`.
This makes the API cleaner by explicitly passing it ont `createLView`.
PR Close#28461
Prior to this change contentQueriesRefresh functions that represent refresh logic for @ContentQuery list were not composable, which caused problems in case one Directive inherits another one and both of them contain Content Queries. Due to the fact that we used indices to reference queries in refresh function, results were placed into wrong Queries. In order to avoid that we no longer use indices to reference queries and instead maintain current content query index while iterating through them. This allows us to compose contentQueriesRefresh functions and make inheritance feature work with Content Queries.
PR Close#28324
Prior to this change `viewQuery` functions that represent @ViewQuery list were not composable, which caused problems in case one Component/Directive inherits another one and both of them contain View Queries. Due to the fact that we used indices to reference queries, resulting query set was corrupted (child component queries were overridden by super class ones). In order to avoid that we no longer use indices assigned at compile time and instead maintain current view query index while iterating through them. This allows us to compose `viewQuery` functions and make inheritance feature work with View Queries.
PR Close#28309
When requesting a queries instance for a node, it was previously
decided whether it needs to be cloned if the node was not already marked
as hosting a query. This check is in place to have only a single queries
instance per node.
The issue with this approach is that no clone is created for subsequent
instantiations of a component, as the TNode is already marked as hosting
a query during first template pass, whereas the cloning of queries
should be independent of first template pass.
To overcome this issue, the queries are assigned an owner TNode such
that it can reliably be determined if a clone needs to be created.
PR Close#27892
Prior to this commit, we had two different modes for change detection
execution for Ivy, depending on whether you called `bootstrap()` or
`renderComponent()`. In the former case, we would complete creation
mode for all components in the tree before beginning update mode for
any component. In the latter case, we would run creation mode and
update mode together for each component individually.
Maintaining code to support these two different execution orders was
unnecessarily complex, so this commit aligns the two bootstrapping
mechanisms to execute in the same order. Now creation mode always
runs for all components before update mode begins.
This change also simplifies our rendering logic so that we use
`LView` flags as the source of truth for rendering mode instead of
`rf` function arguments. This fixed some related bugs (e.g. calling
`ViewRef.detectChanges` synchronously after the view's creation
would create view nodes twice, view queries would execute twice, etc).
PR Close#27744
BREAKING CHANGE:
The public API for `DebugNode` was accidentally too broad. This change removes
1. Public constructor. Since `DebugNode` is a way for Angular to communicate information
on to the developer there is no reason why the developer should ever need to
Instantiate the `DebugNode`
2. We are also removing `removeChild`, `addChild`, `insertBefore`, and `insertChildAfter`.
All of these methods are used by Angular to constructor the correct `DebugNode` tree.
There is no reason why the developer should ever be constructing a `DebugNode` tree
And these methods should have never been made public.
3. All properties have been change to `readonly` since `DebugNode` is used by Angular
to communicate to developer and there is no reason why these APIs should be writable.
While technically breaking change we don’t expect anyone to be effected by this change.
PR Close#27223
