NOTE: This change must be reverted with previous deletes so that it code remains in build-able state.
This change deletes old styling code and replaces it with a simplified styling algorithm.
The mental model for the new algorithm is:
- Create a linked list of styling bindings in the order of priority. All styling bindings ere executed in compiled order and than a linked list of bindings is created in priority order.
- Flush the style bindings at the end of `advance()` instruction. This implies that there are two flush events. One at the end of template `advance` instruction in the template. Second one at the end of `hostBindings` `advance` instruction when processing host bindings (if any).
- Each binding instructions effectively updates the string to represent the string at that location. Because most of the bindings are additive, this is a cheap strategy in most cases. In rare cases the strategy requires removing tokens from the styling up to this point. (We expect that to be rare case)S Because, the bindings are presorted in the order of priority, it is safe to resume the processing of the concatenated string from the last change binding.
PR Close#34616
This adds `insertTStyleValue` but does not hook it up to anything yet.
The purpose of this function is to create a linked-list of styling
related bindings. The bindings can be traversed during flush.
The linked list also keeps track of duplicates. This is important
for binding to know if it needs to check other styles for reconciliation.
PR Close#34004
This patch removes the need for the styleSanitizer() instruction in
favor of passing the sanitizer into directly into the styleProp
instruction.
This patch also increases the binding index size for all style/class bindings in preparation for #34418
PR Close#34480
This patch gets rid of the configuration settings present in the
`TStylingContext` array that is used within the styling algorithm
for `[style]`, `[style.prop]`, `[class]` and `[class.name]` bindings.
These configurations now all live inside of the `TNodeFlags`.
PR Close#33540
This patch removes the need to lock the style and class context
instances to track when bindings can be added. What happens now is
that the `tNode.firstUpdatePass` is used to track when bindings are
registered on the context instances.
PR Close#33521
Prior to this fix, all style/class bindings (e.g. `[style]` and
`[class.foo]`) would quietly update a binding value if and when the
current binding value changes during checkNoChanges.
With this patch, all styling instructions will properly check to see
if the value has changed during the second pass of detectChanges()
if checkNoChanges is active.
PR Close#33103
Prior to this fix, whenever a style or class binding is present, the
binding application process would require an instance of `TStylingContext`
to be built regardless of whether or not any binding resolution is needed
(just so that it knows whether or not there are any collisions).
This check is, however, unnecessary because if (and only if) there
are directives present on the element then are collisions possible.
This patch removes the need for style/class bindings to register
themselves on to a `TStylingContext` if there are no directives and
present on an element. This means that all map and prop-based
style/class bindings are applied as soon as bindings are updated on
an element.
PR Close#32919
In the previous patch () all the existing styling code was turned
off in favor of using the new refactored ivy styling code. This
patch is a follow up patch to that and removes all old, unused
styling code from the render3 directory.
PR Close#31193
This is the final patch to migrate the Angular styling code to have a
smaller instruction set in preparation for the runtime refactor. All
styling-related instructions now work both in template and hostBindings
functions and do not use `element` as a prefix for their names:
BEFORE:
elementStyling()
elementStyleProp()
elementClassProp()
elementStyleMap()
elementClassMap()
elementStylingApply()
AFTER:
styling()
styleProp()
classProp()
styleMap()
classMap()
stylingApply()
PR Close#30318
This patch breaks up the existing `elementStylingMap` into
`elementClassMap` and `elementStyleMap` instructions. It also breaks
apart `hostStlyingMap` into `hostClassMap` and `hostStyleMap`
instructions. This change allows for better tree-shaking and reduces
the complexity of the styling algorithm code for `[style]` and `[class]`
bindings.
PR Close#30293
The new styling algorithm in angular is designed to evaluate host
bindings stylinh priority in order of directive evaluation order. This,
however, does not work with respect to parent/sub-class directives
because sub-class host bindings are run after the parent host bindings
but still have priority. This patch ensures that the host styling bindings
for parent and sub-class components/directives are executed with respect
to the styling algorithm prioritization.
Jira Issue: FW-1132
PR Close#29602
Angular Ivy interprets inline static style/class attribute values as instructions that
are processed whilst an element gets created. Because these inline style values are
referenced by style/class bindings, their inline style values are applied at a later
stage. Despite them being eventually applied, their values should be applied earlier
before any directives are instantiated so that directive code can rely on any inline
style/class changes.
This patch ensures that all static style/class attribute values are applied (rendered)
on the element before directives are instantiated.
Jira Issue: FW-1133
PR Close#29269
Angular supports having a component extend off of a parent component.
When this happens, all annotation-level data is inherited including styles
and classes. Up until now, Ivy only paid attention to static styling
values on the parent component and not the child component. This patch
ensures that both the parent's component and child component's styling
data is merged and rendered accordingly.
Jira Issue: FW-1081
PR Close#29015
For efficiency reasons we often put several different data types (`RNode`, `LView`, `LContainer`,
`StylingContext`) in same location in `LView`. This is because we don't want to pre-allocate
space
for it because the storage is sparse. This file contains utilities for dealing with such data
types.
How do we know what is stored at a given location in `LView`.
- `Array.isArray(value) === false` => `RNode` (The normal storage value)
- `Array.isArray(value) === true` => than the `value[0]` represents the wrapped value.
- `typeof value[TYPE] === 'object'` => `LView`
- This happens when we have a component at a given location
- `typeof value[TYPE] === 'number'` => `StylingContext`
- This happens when we have style/class binding at a given location.
- `typeof value[TYPE] === true` => `LContainer`
- This happens when we have `LContainer` binding at a given location.
NOTE: it is assumed that `Array.isArray` and `typeof` operations are very efficient.
PR Close#28947
`LView`, `LContainer`, `StylingContext` are all arrays which wrap either
an `HTMLElement`, `LView`, `LContainer`, `StylingContext`. It is often
necessary to retrieve the correct type of element from the location
which means that we often have to wrap the arrays. Logically it makes
more sense if the thing which we are wrapping is at `0` location. Also
it may be more performant since data is more local which may result in
more L2 cache hits in CPU.
PR Close#28947
Up until now, `[style]` and `[class]` bindings (the map-based ones) have only
worked as template bindings and have not been supported at all inside of host
bindings. This patch ensures that multiple host binding sources (components and
directives) all properly assign style values and merge them correctly in terms
of priority.
Jira: FW-882
PR Close#28246
