There is an encoding issue with using delta `Δ`, where the browser will attempt to detect the file encoding if the character set is not explicitly declared on a `<script/>` tag, and Chrome will find the `Δ` character and decide it is window-1252 encoding, which misinterprets the `Δ` character to be some other character that is not a valid JS identifier character
So back to the frog eyes we go.
```
__
/ɵɵ\
( -- ) - I am ineffable. I am forever.
_/ \_
/ \ / \
== == ==
```
PR Close#30546
This is the first refactor PR designed to change how styling bindings
(i.e. `[style]` and `[class]`) behave in Ivy. Instead of having a heavy
element-by-element context be generated for each element, this new
refactor aims to use a single context for each `tNode` element that is
examined and iterated over when styling values are to be applied to the
element.
This patch brings this new functionality to prop-based bindings such as
`[style.prop]` and `[class.name]`.
PR Close#30469
This is the final patch to migrate the Angular styling code to have a
smaller instruction set in preparation for the runtime refactor. All
styling-related instructions now work both in template and hostBindings
functions and do not use `element` as a prefix for their names:
BEFORE:
elementStyling()
elementStyleProp()
elementClassProp()
elementStyleMap()
elementClassMap()
elementStylingApply()
AFTER:
styling()
styleProp()
classProp()
styleMap()
classMap()
stylingApply()
PR Close#30318
This patch breaks up the existing `elementStylingMap` into
`elementClassMap` and `elementStyleMap` instructions. It also breaks
apart `hostStlyingMap` into `hostClassMap` and `hostStyleMap`
instructions. This change allows for better tree-shaking and reduces
the complexity of the styling algorithm code for `[style]` and `[class]`
bindings.
PR Close#30293
Stores the views that are part of a container directly on the `LContainer`, rather than maintaining a dedicated sub-array.
This PR resolves FW-1288.
PR Close#30179
Fixes `HostBinding` and `HostListener` declarations not being inherited from base classes that don't have an Angular decorator.
This PR resolves FW-1275.
PR Close#30158
Fixes view and content queries not being inherited in Ivy, if the base class hasn't been annotated with an Angular decorator (e.g. `Component` or `Directive`).
Also reworks the way the `ngBaseDef` is created so that it is added at the same point as the queries, rather than inside of the `Input` and `Output` decorators.
This PR partially resolves FW-1275. Support for host bindings will be added in a follow-up, because this PR is somewhat large as it is.
PR Close#30015
Previous to this change, we assumed embedded views could only be created after
their parent template node had completed processing. As a result, we only set
up query logic for containers after directives on the node were created.
However, this assumption didn't take into account the case where a directive
on a template node could create views in its constructor.
This commit fixes query logic to work with views created in constructors.
In that case, we need to create a query container before the new view is
rendered so query results in the view aren't lost. But since the query container
is created before directives have completed processing, we also have to ensure
that query results gathered later on the template node are inserted before that
query container. Otherwise, query results in embedded views will clobber query
results on template nodes.
This splice mode may be slightly slower than the normal matching for queries on
containers, but we should only fall back to this strategy in the edge case where
views are created in constructors. (We should encourage developers to create
views in ngOnInit instead).
PR Close#29983
The `Δ` caused issue with other infrastructure, and we are temporarily
changing it to `ɵɵ`.
This commit also patches ts_api_guardian_test and AIO to understand `ɵɵ`.
PR Close#29850
- Removes `@publicApi` annotation from ivy instructions
- Adds new `@codeGenApi` annotation to ivy instructions
- Updates ts_api_guardian to support the new annotation properly
PR Close#29820
Currently in Ivy we pass both the raw and parsed selectors to the projectionDef instruction, because the parsed selectors are used to match most nodes, whereas the raw ones are used to match against nodes with the ngProjectAs attribute. The raw selectors add a fair bit of code that won't be used in most cases, because ngProjectAs is somewhat rare.
These changes rework the compiler not to output the raw selectors in the projectionDef, but to parse the selector in ngProjectAs and to store it on the TAttributes. The logic for matching has also been changed so that it matches the pre-parsed ngProjectAs selector against the list of projection selectors.
PR Close#29578
The new styling algorithm in angular is designed to evaluate host
bindings stylinh priority in order of directive evaluation order. This,
however, does not work with respect to parent/sub-class directives
because sub-class host bindings are run after the parent host bindings
but still have priority. This patch ensures that the host styling bindings
for parent and sub-class components/directives are executed with respect
to the styling algorithm prioritization.
Jira Issue: FW-1132
PR Close#29602
Prior to this change, we always recompile all Components/Directives/Pipes even if they were AOT-compiled and had no overrides. This is causing problems in case we try to recompile a Component with "templateUrl" or "styleUrls" (which were already resolved in case of AOT) and generally this unnecessary work that TestBed was doing is not required. This commit adds extra logic to check whether a Component/Directive/Pipe already have compiled NG def (like ngComponentDef) and whether there are no overrides present - in this case recompilation is skipped. Recompilation is also skipped in case a Component/Directive has only Provider overrides - in this situation providers resolver function is patched to reflect overrides. Provider overrides are very common in g3, thus this code path ensures no full recompilation.
PR Close#29294
- Remove an extra type `ViewOrElement`, which even had the same numeric value as `View`.
- Updates comment to remove part about alleged bit-masking that we could be doing here.
We aren't using this with bitmasks, and if we were, everything would be a `NodeType.Container`,
because it's value was `0`.
- Updates the number values to be simple, human-readable integers, since we're not using these
with any kind of bit-manipulation.
- Add comments about each type.
PR Close#29343
Angular Ivy interprets inline static style/class attribute values as instructions that
are processed whilst an element gets created. Because these inline style values are
referenced by style/class bindings, their inline style values are applied at a later
stage. Despite them being eventually applied, their values should be applied earlier
before any directives are instantiated so that directive code can rely on any inline
style/class changes.
This patch ensures that all static style/class attribute values are applied (rendered)
on the element before directives are instantiated.
Jira Issue: FW-1133
PR Close#29269
The content projection mechanism is static, in that it only looks at the static
template nodes before directives are matched and change detection is run.
When you have a selector-based content projection the selection is based
on nodes that are available in the template.
For example:
```
<ng-content selector="[some-attr]"></ng-content>
```
would match
```
<div some-attr="..."></div>
```
If you have an inline-template in your projected nodes. For example:
```
<div *ngIf="..." some-attr="..."></div>
```
This gets pre-parsed and converted to a canonical form.
For example:
```
<ng-template [ngIf]="...">
<div some-attr=".."></div>
</ng-template>
```
Note that only structural attributes (e.g. `*ngIf`) stay with the `<ng-template>`
node. The other attributes move to the contained element inside the template.
When this happens in ivy, the ng-template content is removed
from the component template function and is compiled into its own
template function. But this means that the information about the
attributes that were on the content are lost and the projection
selection mechanism is unable to match the original
`<div *ngIf="..." some-attr>`.
This commit adds support for this in ivy. Attributes are separated into three
groups (Bindings, Templates and "other"). For inline-templates the Bindings
and "other" types are hoisted back from the contained node to the `template()`
instruction, so that they can be used in content projection matching.
PR Close#29041
This commit adds a new `AttributeMarker` type that will be used, in a
future commit, to mark attributes as coming from an inline-template
expansion, rather than the element that is being contained in the template.
PR Close#29041
Angular supports having a component extend off of a parent component.
When this happens, all annotation-level data is inherited including styles
and classes. Up until now, Ivy only paid attention to static styling
values on the parent component and not the child component. This patch
ensures that both the parent's component and child component's styling
data is merged and rendered accordingly.
Jira Issue: FW-1081
PR Close#29015
For efficiency reasons we often put several different data types (`RNode`, `LView`, `LContainer`,
`StylingContext`) in same location in `LView`. This is because we don't want to pre-allocate
space
for it because the storage is sparse. This file contains utilities for dealing with such data
types.
How do we know what is stored at a given location in `LView`.
- `Array.isArray(value) === false` => `RNode` (The normal storage value)
- `Array.isArray(value) === true` => than the `value[0]` represents the wrapped value.
- `typeof value[TYPE] === 'object'` => `LView`
- This happens when we have a component at a given location
- `typeof value[TYPE] === 'number'` => `StylingContext`
- This happens when we have style/class binding at a given location.
- `typeof value[TYPE] === true` => `LContainer`
- This happens when we have `LContainer` binding at a given location.
NOTE: it is assumed that `Array.isArray` and `typeof` operations are very efficient.
PR Close#28947
`LView`, `LContainer`, `StylingContext` are all arrays which wrap either
an `HTMLElement`, `LView`, `LContainer`, `StylingContext`. It is often
necessary to retrieve the correct type of element from the location
which means that we often have to wrap the arrays. Logically it makes
more sense if the thing which we are wrapping is at `0` location. Also
it may be more performant since data is more local which may result in
more L2 cache hits in CPU.
PR Close#28947
- TView no longer stores childIndex
- LView now as CHILD_HEAD and CHILD_TAIL
TView used to store the head of the list, therefor all LViews had to have the same head, which is incorrect.
PR Close#28382
- Removes CONTAINER_INDEX
- LView[PARENT] now contains LContainer when necessary
- Removes now unused arguments to methods after refactor
PR Close#28382
Fixes the `ngOnDestroy` hook on a component or directive being called twice, if the type is also registered as a provider.
This PR resolves FW-1010.
PR Close#28470
This commit adds support for the `static: true` flag in `ContentChild`
queries. Prior to this commit, all `ContentChild` queries were resolved
after change detection ran. This is a problem for backwards
compatibility because View Engine also supported "static" queries which
would resolve before change detection.
Now if users add a `static: true` option, the query will be resolved in
creation mode (before change detection runs). For example:
```ts
@ContentChild(TemplateRef, {static: true}) template !: TemplateRef;
```
This feature will come in handy for components that need
to create components dynamically.
PR Close#28811
This commit adds support for the `static: true` flag in
`ViewChild` queries. Prior to this commit, all `ViewChild`
queries were resolved after change detection ran. This is
a problem for backwards compatibility because View Engine
also supported "static" queries which would resolve before
change detection.
Now if users add a `static: true` option, the query will be
resolved in creation mode (before change detection runs).
For example:
```ts
@ViewChild(TemplateRef, {static: true}) template !: TemplateRef;
```
This feature will come in handy for components that need
to create components dynamically.
PR Close#28811
Accounts for schemas in when validating properties in Ivy.
This PR resolves FW-819.
A couple of notes:
* I had to rework the test slightly, in order to have it fail when we expect it to. The one in master is passing since Ivy's validation runs during the update phase, rather than creation.
* I had to deviate from the design in FW-819 and not add an `enableSchema` instruction, because the schema is part of the `NgModule` scope, however the scope is only assigned to a component once all of the module's declarations have been resolved and some of them can be async. Instead, I opted to have the `schemas` on the component definition.
PR Close#28637
Prior to this fix if a root component was instantiated it create host
bindings, but never render them once update mode ran unless one or more
slot-allocated bindings were issued. Since styling in Ivy does not make
use of LView slots, the host bindings function never ran on the root
component.
This fix ensures that the `hostBindings` function does run for a root
component and also renders the schedlued styling instructions when
executed.
Jira Issue: FW-1062
PR Close#28664
Prior to this update we had separate contentQueries and contentQueriesRefresh functions to handle creation and update phases. This approach was inconsistent with View Queries, Host Bindings and Template functions that we generate for Component/Directive defs. Now the mentioned 2 functions are combines into one (contentQueries), creation and update logic is separated with RenderFlags (similar to what we have in other generated functions).
PR Close#28503
For TypeScript compilation units that have the "strictFunctionTypes"
option enabled, an error would be produced for Ivy's definition fields
in declaration files in the case of inheritance across directives or
pipes.
This change loosens the definition types to allow for subtypes of the
defined type where necessary.
A test package that has the "strict" option enabled verifies that we
won't regress in environments where strict type checking is enabled.
Fixes#28079
PR Close#28634
Up until now, `[style]` and `[class]` bindings (the map-based ones) have only
worked as template bindings and have not been supported at all inside of host
bindings. This patch ensures that multiple host binding sources (components and
directives) all properly assign style values and merge them correctly in terms
of priority.
Jira: FW-882
PR Close#28246
`LView` `HOST` was set in most cases right after creating `LView`.
This makes the API cleaner by explicitly passing it ont `createLView`.
PR Close#28461
i18n instructions create text nodes dynamically and save them between bindings and the expando block in `LView`. e.g., they try to create the following order in `LView`.
```
| -- elements -- | -- bindings -- | -- dynamic i18n text -- | -- expando (dirs, injectors) -- |
```
Each time a new text node is created, it is pushed to the end of the array and the `expandoStartIndex` marker is incremented, so the section begins slightly later. This happens in `allocExpando`.
This is fine if no directives have been created yet. The end of the array will be in the "dynamic text node" section.
| -- elements -- | -- bindings -- | -- dynamic i18n text -- |
However, this approach doesn't work if dynamic text nodes are created after directives are matched (for example when the directive uses host bindings). In that case, there are already directives and injectors saved in the "expando" section. So pushing to the end of `LView` actually pushes after the expando section. What we get is this:
```
| -- elements -- | -- bindings -- | -- dynamic i18n text -- | -- expando -- | -- dynamic i18n text-- |
```
In this case, the `expandoStartIndex` shouldn't be incremented because we are not inserting anything before the expando section (it's now after the expando section). But because it is incremented in the code right now, it's now pointing to an index in the middle of the expando section.
This PR fixes that so that we only increment the `expandoStartIndex` if nothing was pushed into the expando section.
FW-978 #resolve
PR Close#28424
In Ivy, we support a new manual mode that allows for stricter control
over change detection in OnPush components. Specifically, in this mode,
events do not automatically mark OnPush views as dirty. Only changed
inputs and manual calls to `markDirty()` actually mark a view dirty.
However, this mode cannot be the default for OnPush components if we
want to be backwards compatible with View Engine. This commit re-adds
the legacy logic for OnPush components where events always mark views
dirty and makes it the default behavior.
Note: It is still TODO to add a public API for manual change detection.
PR Close#28474
When testing whether `value` is an object, use the ideal sequence of
strictly not equal to `null` followed by `typeof value === 'object'`
consistently. Specifically there's no point in using double equal with
`null` since `undefined` is ruled out by the `typeof` check.
Also avoid the unnecessary ToBoolean check on `value.ngOnDestroy` in
`hasOnDestroy()`, since the `typeof value.ngOnDestroy === 'function'`
will only let closures pass and all closures are truish (with the
notable exception of `document.all`, but that shouldn't be relevant
for the `ngOnDestroy` hook).
PR Close#28400
Prior to this change contentQueriesRefresh functions that represent refresh logic for @ContentQuery list were not composable, which caused problems in case one Directive inherits another one and both of them contain Content Queries. Due to the fact that we used indices to reference queries in refresh function, results were placed into wrong Queries. In order to avoid that we no longer use indices to reference queries and instead maintain current content query index while iterating through them. This allows us to compose contentQueriesRefresh functions and make inheritance feature work with Content Queries.
PR Close#28324
