In #34288, ngtsc was refactored to separate the result of the analysis
and resolve phase for more granular incremental rebuilds. In this model,
any errors in one phase transition the trait into an error state, which
prevents it from being ran through subsequent phases. The ngcc compiler
on the other hand did not adopt this strict error model, which would
cause incomplete metadata—due to errors in earlier phases—to be offered
for compilation that could result in a hard crash.
This commit updates ngcc to take advantage of ngtsc's `TraitCompiler`,
that internally manages all Ivy classes that are part of the
compilation. This effectively replaces ngcc's own `AnalyzedFile` and
`AnalyzedClass` types, together with all of the logic to drive the
`DecoratorHandler`s. All of this is now handled in the `TraitCompiler`,
benefiting from its explicit state transitions of `Trait`s so that the
ngcc crash is a thing of the past.
Fixes#34500
Resolves FW-1788
PR Close#34889
The undecorated child migration creates a synthetic decorator, which
contained `"exportAs": ["exportName"]` as obtained from the metadata of
the parent class. This is a problem, as `exportAs` needs to specified
as a comma-separated string instead of an array. This commit fixes the
bug by transforming the array of export names back to a comma-separated
string.
PR Close#34014
In Angular View Engine, there are two kinds of decorator inheritance:
1) both the parent and child classes have decorators
This case is supported by InheritDefinitionFeature, which merges some fields
of the definitions (such as the inputs or queries).
2) only the parent class has a decorator
If the child class is missing a decorator, the compiler effectively behaves
as if the parent class' decorator is applied to the child class as well.
This is the "undecorated child" scenario, and this commit adds a migration
to ngcc to support this pattern in Ivy.
This migration has 2 phases. First, the NgModules of the application are
scanned for classes in 'declarations' which are missing decorators, but
whose base classes do have decorators. These classes are the undecorated
children. This scan is performed recursively, so even if a declared class
has a base class that itself inherits a decorator, this case is handled.
Next, a synthetic decorator (either @Component or @Directive) is created
on the child class. This decorator copies some critical information such
as 'selector' and 'exportAs', as well as supports any decorated fields
(@Input, etc). A flag is passed to the decorator compiler which causes a
special feature `CopyDefinitionFeature` to be included on the compiled
definition. This feature copies at runtime the remaining aspects of the
parent definition which `InheritDefinitionFeature` does not handle,
completing the "full" inheritance of the child class' decorator from its
parent class.
PR Close#33362
Previously, the (currently disabled) undecorated parent migration in
ngcc would produce errors when a base class could not be determined
statically or when a class extends from a class in another package. This
is not ideal, as it would cause the library to fail compilation without
a workaround, whereas those problems are not guaranteed to cause issues.
Additionally, inheritance chains were not handled. This commit reworks
the migration to address these limitations.
PR Close#33362
In ngcc's migration system, synthetic decorators can be injected into a
compilation to ensure that certain classes are compiled with Angular
logic, where the original library code did not include the necessary
decorators. Prior to this change, synthesized decorators would have a
fake AST structure as associated node and a made-up identifier. In
theory, this may introduce issues downstream:
1) a decorator's node is used for diagnostics, so it must have position
information. Having fake AST nodes without a position is therefore a
problem. Note that this is currently not a problem in practice, as
injected synthesized decorators would not produce any diagnostics.
2) the decorator's identifier should refer to an imported symbol.
Therefore, it is required that the symbol is actually imported.
Moreover, bundle formats such as UMD and CommonJS use namespaces for
imports, so a bare `ts.Identifier` would not be suitable to use as
identifier. This was also not a problem in practice, as the identifier
is only used in the `setClassMetadata` generated code, which is omitted
for synthetically injected decorators.
To remedy these potential issues, this commit makes a decorator's
identifier optional and switches its node over from a fake AST structure
to the class' name.
PR Close#33362
A class that is provided as Angular service is required to have an
`@Injectable()` decorator so that the compiler generates its injectable
definition for the runtime. Applications are automatically migrated
using the "missing-injectable" schematic, however libraries built for
older version of Angular may not yet satisfy this requirement.
This commit ports the "missing-injectable" schematic to a migration that
is ran when ngcc is processing a library. This ensures that any service
that is provided from an NgModule or Directive/Component will have an
`@Injectable()` decorator.
PR Close#33362
Directive defs are not considered public API, so the property
that contains them should be prefixed with Angular's marker
for "private" ('ɵ') to discourage apps from relying on def
APIs directly.
This commit adds the prefix and shortens the name from
ngDirectiveDef to dir. This is because property names
cannot be minified by Uglify without turning on property
mangling (which most apps have turned off) and are thus
size-sensitive.
Note that the other "defs" (ngFactoryDef, etc) will be
prefixed and shortened in follow-up PRs, in an attempt to
limit how large and conflict-y this change is.
PR Close#33110
One of the compiler's tasks is to enumerate the exports of a given ES
module. This can happen for example to resolve `foo.bar` where `foo` is a
namespace import:
```typescript
import * as foo from './foo';
@NgModule({
directives: [foo.DIRECTIVES],
})
```
In this case, the compiler must enumerate the exports of `foo.ts` in order
to evaluate the expression `foo.DIRECTIVES`.
When this operation occurs under ngcc, it must deal with the different
module formats and types of exports that occur. In commonjs code, a problem
arises when certain exports are downleveled.
```typescript
export const DIRECTIVES = [
FooDir,
BarDir,
];
```
can be downleveled to:
```javascript
exports.DIRECTIVES = [
FooDir,
BarDir,
```
Previously, ngtsc and ngcc expected that any export would have an associated
`ts.Declaration` node. `export class`, `export function`, etc. all retain
`ts.Declaration`s even when downleveled. But the `export const` construct
above does not. Therefore, ngcc would not detect `DIRECTIVES` as an export
of `foo.ts`, and the evaluation of `foo.DIRECTIVES` would therefore fail.
To solve this problem, the core concept of an exported `Declaration`
according to the `ReflectionHost` API is split into a `ConcreteDeclaration`
which has a `ts.Declaration`, and an `InlineDeclaration` which instead has
a `ts.Expression`. Differentiating between these allows ngcc to return an
`InlineDeclaration` for `DIRECTIVES` and correctly keep track of this
export.
PR Close#32129
