All errors for existing fields have been detected and suppressed with a
`!` assertion.
Issue/24571 is tracking proper clean up of those instances.
One-line change required in ivy/compilation.ts, because it appears that
the new syntax causes tsickle emitted node to no longer track their
original sourceFiles.
PR Close#24572
This change supports compilation of components, directives, and modules
within ngtsc. Support is not complete, but is enough to compile and test
//packages/core/test/bundling/todo in full AOT mode. Code size benefits
are not yet achieved as //packages/core itself does not get compiled, and
some decorators (e.g. @Input) are not stripped, leading to unwanted code
being retained by the tree-shaker. This will be improved in future commits.
PR Close#24427
NOTE: This does NOT add parsing of namespaced attributes
- Adds AttributeMarker for namespaced attributes
- Adds test for namespaced attributes
- Updates AttributeMarker enum to use CamelCase, and not UPPER_CASE names
PR Close#24386
This PR tackles a simple case where ViewRef definition point (<ng-template>) is the
same as the insertion point (ViewContainerRef requested on the said <ng-template>).
For this particular case we can assume that we know a container into which a given
view will be inserted when a view is created. This is not true fall all the possible
cases so follow-up PR will be needed to extend this basic implementation.
PR Close#24179
In ngIvy directives matching (determining which directives are active based
on a CSS seletor) happens at runtime. This means that runtime needs to have
enough context to match directives. This PR takes care of cases where a directive's
selector should match bindings (ex. [foo]="exp") and event handlers (ex. (out)="do()").
In the mentioned cases we need to have binding / output "attributes" for directive's
CSS selector matching purposes. At the same time those are not regular attributes and
as such should not be reflected in the DOM.
Closes#23706
PR Close#23991
Ivy definition looks something like this:
```
class MyService {
static ngInjectableDef = defineInjectable({
…
});
}
```
Here the argument to `defineInjectable` is well known public contract which needs
to be honored in backward compatible way between versions. The type of the
return value of `defineInjectable` on the other hand is private and can change
shape drastically between versions without effecting backwards compatibility of
libraries publish to NPM. To our users it is effectively an `OpaqueToken`.
By prefixing the type with `ɵ` we are communicating the the outside world that
the value is not public API and is subject to change without backward compatibility.
PR Close#23371
- Remove default injection value from `inject` / `directiveInject` since
it is not possible to set using annotations.
- Module `Injector` is stored on `LView` instead of `LInjector` data
structure because it can change only at `LView` level. (More efficient)
- Add `ngInjectableDef` to `IterableDiffers` so that existing tests can
pass as well as enable `IterableDiffers` to be injectable without
`Injector`
PR Close#23345
This change changes:
- compiler uses `directiveInject` instead of `inject` for `Directive`s
- unifies the flags in `di` as well as `render3`
- changes the signature of `directiveInject` to match `inject` In prep for #23330
- compiler now generates flags for injection.
Compiler portion of #23342
Prep for #23330
PR Close#23345
As we no longer create native (RNode) comment nodes for containers,
we need to execute logic for finding a next sibiling node with RNode
when inserting a view.
The mentioned logic need to be updated for the case of dynamically
created containers (LContainerNode). Indeed, we need to be able to
descend into dynamically inserted views while looking for a RNode.
To achieve this we need to have a pointer from a host LNode to a
dynamically created LContainerNode).
PR Close#23193
This commit fixes a bug that would result in views insert / remove
even if a view needed only refresh operation.
The crux of the bug was that we were looking for a view to update
only in the LContainer.nextIndex position. This is incorrect as a
view with a given block id could be present later in the views
array (this happens if we about to remove a view in the middle of
the views array).
The code in this fix searches for a view to update in the views array and
can remove views in the middle of the views collection. Previously we
would remove views at the end of the collection only.
PR Close#22656
