An enum declaration in TypeScript code will be emitted into JavaScript
as a regular variable declaration, with the enum members being declared
inside an IIFE. For ngcc to support interpreting such variable
declarations as enum declarations with its members, ngcc needs to
recognize the enum declaration emit structure and extract all member
from the statements in the IIFE.
This commit extends the `ConcreteDeclaration` structure in the
`ReflectionHost` abstraction to be able to capture the enum members
on a variable declaration, as a substitute for the original
`ts.EnumDeclaration` as it existed in TypeScript code. The static
interpreter has been extended to handle the extracted enum members
as it would have done for `ts.EnumDeclaration`.
Fixes#35584
Resolves FW-2069
PR Close#36550
Consider a library that uses a shared constant for host bindings. e.g.
```ts
export const BASE_BINDINGS= {
'[class.mat-themed]': '_isThemed',
}
----
@Directive({
host: {...BASE_BINDINGS, '(click)': '...'}
})
export class Dir1 {}
@Directive({
host: {...BASE_BINDINGS, '(click)': '...'}
})
export class Dir2 {}
```
Previously when these components were shipped as part of the
library to NPM, consumers were able to consume `Dir1` and `Dir2`.
No errors showed up.
Now with Ivy, when ngcc tries to process the library, an error
will be thrown. The error is stating that the host bindings should
be an object (which they obviously are). This happens because
TypeScript transforms the object spread to individual
`Object.assign` calls (for compatibility).
The partial evaluator used by the `@Directive` annotation handler
is unable to process this expression because there is no
integrated support for `Object.assign`. In View Engine, this was
not a problem because the `metadata.json` files from the library
were used to compute the host bindings.
Fixes#34659
PR Close#34661
In #32902 a bug was supposedly fixed where internal classes as used
within `ModuleWithProviders` are publicly exported, even when the
typings file already contained the generic type on the
`ModuleWithProviders`. This fix turns out to have been incomplete, as
the `ModuleWithProviders` analysis is not done when not processing the
typings files.
The effect of this bug is that formats that are processed after the
initial format had been processed would not have exports for internal
symbols, resulting in "export '...' was not found in '...'" errors.
This commit fixes the bug by always running the `ModuleWithProviders`
analyzer. An integration test has been added that would fail prior to
this change.
Fixes#33701
PR Close#33875
ngcc may need to insert public exports into the bundle's source as well
as to the entry-point's declaration file, as the Ivy compiler may need
to create import statements to internal library types. The way ngcc
knows which exports to add is through the references registry, to which
references to things that require a public export are added by the
various analysis steps that are executed.
One of these analysis steps is the augmentation of declaration files
where functions that return `ModuleWithProviders` are updated so that a
generic type argument is added that corresponds with the `NgModule` that
is actually imported. This type has to be publicly exported, so the
analyzer step has to add the module type to the references registry.
A problem occurs when `ModuleWithProviders` already has a generic type
argument, in which case no update of the declaration file is necessary.
This may happen when 1) ngcc is processing additional bundle formats, so
that the declaration file has already been updated while processing the
first bundle format, or 2) when a package is processed which already
contains the generic type in its source. In both scenarios it may occur
that the referenced `NgModule` type does not yet have a public export,
so it is crucial that a reference to the type is added to the
references registry, which ngcc failed to do.
This commit fixes the issue by always adding the referenced `NgModule`
type to the references registry, so that a public export will always be
created if necessary.
Resolves FW-1575
PR Close#32902
In ngcc's reflection hosts for compiled JS bundles, such as ESM2015,
special care needs to be taken for classes as there may be an outer
declaration (referred to as "declaration") and an inner declaration
(referred to as "implementation") for a given class. Therefore, there
will also be two `ts.Symbol`s bound per class, and ngcc needs to switch
between those declarations and symbols depending on where certain
information can be found.
Prior to this commit, the `NgccReflectionHost` interface had methods
`getClassSymbol` and `findClassSymbols` that would return a `ts.Symbol`.
These class symbols would be used to kick off compilation of components
using ngtsc, so it is important for these symbols to correspond with the
publicly visible outer declaration of the class. However, the ESM2015
reflection host used to return the `ts.Symbol` for the inner
declaration, if the class was declared as follows:
```javascript
var MyClass = class MyClass {};
```
For the above code, `Esm2015ReflectionHost.getClassSymbol` would return
the `ts.Symbol` corresponding with the `class MyClass {}` declaration,
whereas it should have corresponded with the `var MyClass` declaration.
As a consequence, no `NgModule` could be resolved for the component, so
no components/directives would be in scope for the component. This
resulted in errors during runtime.
This commit resolves the issue by introducing a `NgccClassSymbol` that
contains references to both the outer and inner `ts.Symbol`, instead of
just a single `ts.Symbol`. This avoids the unclarity of whether a
`ts.Symbol` corresponds with the outer or inner declaration.
More details can be found here: https://hackmd.io/7nkgWOFWQlSRAuIW_8KPPwFixes#32078
Closes FW-1507
PR Close#32539
One of the compiler's tasks is to enumerate the exports of a given ES
module. This can happen for example to resolve `foo.bar` where `foo` is a
namespace import:
```typescript
import * as foo from './foo';
@NgModule({
directives: [foo.DIRECTIVES],
})
```
In this case, the compiler must enumerate the exports of `foo.ts` in order
to evaluate the expression `foo.DIRECTIVES`.
When this operation occurs under ngcc, it must deal with the different
module formats and types of exports that occur. In commonjs code, a problem
arises when certain exports are downleveled.
```typescript
export const DIRECTIVES = [
FooDir,
BarDir,
];
```
can be downleveled to:
```javascript
exports.DIRECTIVES = [
FooDir,
BarDir,
```
Previously, ngtsc and ngcc expected that any export would have an associated
`ts.Declaration` node. `export class`, `export function`, etc. all retain
`ts.Declaration`s even when downleveled. But the `export const` construct
above does not. Therefore, ngcc would not detect `DIRECTIVES` as an export
of `foo.ts`, and the evaluation of `foo.DIRECTIVES` would therefore fail.
To solve this problem, the core concept of an exported `Declaration`
according to the `ReflectionHost` API is split into a `ConcreteDeclaration`
which has a `ts.Declaration`, and an `InlineDeclaration` which instead has
a `ts.Expression`. Differentiating between these allows ngcc to return an
`InlineDeclaration` for `DIRECTIVES` and correctly keep track of this
export.
PR Close#32129
Previously we were relying upon the `.get()` method to return `undefined`
but it is clearer and safer to always check with `.has()` first.
PR Close#25445
In ES2015, classes could have been emitted as a variable declaration
initialized with a class expression. In certain situations, an intermediary
variable suffixed with `_1` is present such that the variable
declaration's initializer becomes a binary expression with its rhs being
the class expression, and its lhs being the identifier of the intermediate
variable. This structure was not recognized, resulting in such classes not
being considered as a class in `Esm2015ReflectionHost`.
As a consequence, the analysis of functions/methods that return a
`ModuleWithProviders` object did not take the methods of such classes into
account.
Another edge-case with such intermediate variable was that static
properties would not be considered as class members. A testcase was added
to prevent regressions.
Fixes#29078
PR Close#29119
In ESM5 code, static methods appear as property assignments onto the constructor
function. For example:
```
var MyClass = (function() {
function MyClass () {}
MyClass.staticMethod = function() {};
return MyClass;
})();
```
This commit teaches ngcc how to process these forms when searching
for `ModuleWithProviders` functions that need to be updated in the typings
files.
PR Close#29092
