Fixes#18013
Previously it was hard to debug an `expectOne` if the request had no match, as the error message was:
Expected one matching request for criteria "Match URL: /some-url?query=hello", found none.
This commit adds a bit more info to the error, by listing the actual requests received:
Expected one matching request for criteria "Match URL: /some-url?query=hello", found none. Requests received are: POST /some-url?query=world.
PR Close#27005
https://angular.io/resources needs to be sturctured to be able to navigate to all resources with improved user experience. A lone scroll bar in this page will not help the reader a great deal in exploring the resources
Fixes#33526
PR Close#34756
Previous to this commit, HTTP params like `{ a: '1', b: [], c: '3' }` resulted in a request like `a=1&&c=3` (note the double &&).
The ideal fix would probably be to stringify these params to `a=1&b=&c=3` like we do for empty string values. But that might be breaking as some APIs may rely on the absence of the parameter.
This fixes the issue in a compatible way by just removing the extra and unnecessary `&`, resulting in `a=1&c=3`.
PR Close#34896
This reverts commit cb142b6df9.
The intention of this commit was for a consumer of the `compile` function to
pass the `bazelHost` it returns into future invocations, reusing the
`FileCache` between them. However, first-party ngc_wrapped does not do this,
which caused a performance regression as the `FileCache` was no longer
shared between compilations.
PR Close#35063
The golang section was recently added to the deployment guide
but has been reported as returning errors, where it had previously
worked. After discussion and testing with
Stephen Fluin, we are removing this section because of
inconsistency in functionality.
PR Close#34099
Update from chokidar 2.x to 3.x in ngc/ngtsc, to eliminate any possibility
of a security issue with a downstream dependency of the package.
FW-1809 #resolve
PR Close#35047
This change changes the priority order of static styling.
Current priority:
```
(least priority)
- Static
- Component
- Directives
- Template
- Dynamic Binding
- Component
- Map/Interpolation
- Property
- Directives
- Map/Interpolation
- Property
- Template
- Map/Interpolation
- Property
(highest priority)
```
The issue with the above priority is this use case:
```
<div style="color: red;" directive-which-sets-color-blue>
```
In the above case the directive will win and the resulting color will be `blue`. However a small change of adding interpolation to the example like so. (Style interpolation is coming in https://github.com/angular/angular/pull/34202)
```
<div style="color: red; width: {{exp}}px" directive-which-sets-color-blue>
```
Changes the priority from static binding to interpolated binding which means now the resulting color is `red`. It is very surprising that adding an unrelated interpolation and style can change the `color` which was not changed. To fix that we need to make sure that the static values are associated with priority of the source (directive or template) where they were declared. The new resulting priority is:
```
(least priority)
- Component
- Static
- Map/Interpolation
- Property
- Directives
- Static
- Map/Interpolation
- Property
- Template
- Static
- Map/Interpolation
- Property
(highest priority)
```
PR Close#34938
Since benchmarks are meant to test in a consistent environment, we
cannot execute the benchmark on RBE executors as executors do not
run in calibrated environments.
PR Close#34996
The current logic pulls multiproviders up to the parent module's
provider list. The result is that the multi provider being defined both in
the imported ModuleWithProviders and the parent and getting an extra
item in the multi provided array of values. This PR fixes that problem
by not pulling providers in ModuleWithProviders up to the parent module.
PR Close#34914
The language service reports an error when a directive's template
context is missing a member that is being used in a template (e.g. if
`$implicit` is being used with a template context typed as `any`).
While this diagnostic message is valuable, typing template contexts
loosely as `any` or `object` is very widespread in community packages,
and often still compiles correctly, so reporting the diagnostic as an
error may be misleading to users.
This commit changes the diagnostic to be a warning, and adds additional
information about how the user can eliminate the warning entirely -- by
refining the template context type.
Closes https://github.com/angular/vscode-ng-language-service/issues/572
PR Close#35036
Sometimes, a request for definitions will return multiple of the same
definition. This can happen in at least the cases of
- two-way bindings (one of the same definition for the property and
event binding)
- multiple template binding expressions in the same attribute
- something like "*ngFor="let i of items; trackBy: test" has two
template bindings, resulting in two template binding ASTs at the
same location (the attribute span). The language service then parses
both of these bindings individually, resulting in two independent
but identical definitions. For more context, see https://github.com/angular/angular/pull/34847#discussion_r371006680.
This commit prunes duplicate definitions by signing definitions with
their location, and checking if that location signature has been seen in
a previous definition returned to the client.
PR Close#34995
In #35004, we started ignoring yarn's engines check for `yarn install`
in AIO's `test-production.sh` script to fix a failure in the
`aio_monitoring_stable` CI job. (See #35004 for details.)
It turns out that the version of yarn used on the stable branch (1.17.3)
`--ignore-engines` is needed on all yarn commands (including `yarn
run`). Thus, #35004 is not enough to fix the failures.
New example failure: https://circleci.com/gh/angular/angular/604341
This commit turns of the engines check for the whole
`aio_monitoring_stable` CI job to fix the failure and make the job more
robust.
PR Close#35033
In #34974 the top level dependency on `@babel/core` was bumped to
7.8.3. This commit ensures that the package.json that gets included
in the `@angular/localize` distributable is at the same version.
PR Close#35008
Previously, when the benchmark tests ran outside of Bazel, developers
had the posibility to control how the tests run through command line
options. e.g. `--dryrun`. This no longer works reliable in Bazel where
command line arguments are not passed to the text executable.
To make the global options still usable (as they could be still useful
in some cases), we just pass them through the Bazel `--test_env`. This
reduces the code we need to read the command line, but still preserves
the flexibility in a Bazel idiomatic way.
PR Close#34753
Currently, based on the file names it's not quite clear whether
a given `.spec.ts` file runs benchmark perf or benchmark e2e
functionality tests. To disambiguate these, we use new file
suffixs. i.e. `e2e-spec.ts` and `perf-spec.ts`.
PR Close#34753
Currently we run all benchmark perf tests in CircleCI. Since we do not
collect any results, we unnecessarily waste CI/RBE resources. Instead,
we should just not run benchmark perf tests in CI, but still run the
functionality e2e tests which ensure that benchmarks are not broken.
We can do this by splitting the perf and e2e tests into separate
files/targets.
PR Close#34753
There are different `DebugNode`/`DebugElement` implementations (and
associated helper functions) for ViewEngine and Ivy. Additionally, these
classes/functions, which are defined inside the `core` package, are
imported by the `platform-browser` package.
Previously, this code was not tree-shaken as expected in Ivy. #30130
partially addressed the issue, but only for the case where `core` and
`platform-browser` end up in the same closure after webpack's scope
hoisting. In cases where this is not the case, our webpack/terser based
tooling is not capable of tree-shaking it.
This commit fixes the problem, by ensuring that the code retained in Ivy
mode (due to the cross-package import) does not unnecessarily reference
`DebugNode`/`DebugElement`, allowing the code to be tree-shaken away.
This results in a 7.6KB reduction in the size of the main angular.io
bundle.
Jira issue: [FW-1802](https://angular-team.atlassian.net/browse/FW-1802)
PR Close#35003
the commit causes lint on upstream/master to fail. We need to fix the script to not check too many past commits, but that
will have to wait until a follow up PR.
PR Close#35017
In #34955, we switched to Node.js v12 on master and 9.0.x. This causes
the `aio_monitoring_job` CI job (which checks out files from the stable
branch; currently 8.2.x) to start failing yarn's engines check (since
the 8.2.x branch expects Node.js version <11).
Example failure: https://circleci.com/gh/angular/angular/602499
Since the job is expected to run with files from both the stable and the
master branches (and since the version of Node.js is not important
here), this commit uses the `--ignore-engines` option to prevent
failures due to Node.js version mismatch.
NOTE:
Typically, the stable and master branch are on the same Node.js version,
because related PRs land on both master and the patch branch. One
exception is during RC periods, when the stable branch is different than
the patch branch. These periods are usually short, but in the case of
9.0.0 the period has lasted several months causing the CI environments
between master and the stable branch to get significantly out-of-sync.
PR Close#35004
* Added a /tools/saucelabs/sauce-service.sh script that manages the sauce-connect as a service which is used by the karma-saucelabs.js wrapper to start the service.
* Added /tools/saucelabs/README.md that covers the details of SauceLabs karma testing with Bazel.
PR Close#34769
earlier p sigly was used to define a paragraph element which was not clear what we want to refer changed it to paragrapg element for better understanding
Fixes#34922
PR Close#34927
This condition is being removed as it currently is failing to work as
expected with pullapprove at the moment. The plan/expectation is that
after a bit of troubleshooting, we will be able to add in the condition
once more. Removing the condition actually returns us to the same
state we were in with CODEOWNERS in which draft PRs are also assigned
reviews.
PR Close#35012
We are migrating to PullApprove for our PR review management in an attempt
to allow for more granular and equitable code review assignments across the
team. Currently this migration is equivalent in the review assignments
it will create. Once stable, our expectation is that we will be able to
take advantage of PullApproves additional features for things like staged
reviews.
PR Close#34814
