In 420b9be1c14ec6900692b641a3d89b99eb9c6e5b all style-based sanitization code was
disabled because modern browsers no longer allow for javascript expressions within
CSS. This patch is a follow-up patch which removes all traces of style sanitization
code (both instructions and runtime logic) for the `[style]` and `[style.prop]` bindings.
PR Close#36965
Prior to this change, animations-related runtime logic assumed that the @HostBinding and @HostListener with synthetic (animations) props are used for Components only. However having @HostBinding and @HostListener with synthetic props on Directives is also supported by View Engine. This commit updates the logic to select correct renderer to execute instructions (current renderer for Directives and sub-component renderer for Components).
This PR resolves#35501.
PR Close#35568
This commit performs a few updates to internal functions that would be required in upcoming changes to support synthetic host bindings in Directives.
* the `elementPropertyInternal` function was refactored to accept renderer as an argument (prior to that, there was a function that loads the renderer in some specific way for animation bindings)
* `elementPropertyInternal`, `elementAttributeInternal` and `listenerInternal` functions were updated to have a fixed set of arguments (for better performance)
* `elementPropertyInternal` and `elementAttributeInternal` functions were updated to take `tNode` as an argument instead of passing node index (that was used to retrieve `tNode` internally), in some cases we already have `tNode` available or we can retrieve it from the state
The refactoring was triggered by the need to pass different renderers to the `elementPropertyInternal` to support synthetic host bindings in Directives (see this comment for additional context: https://github.com/angular/angular/pull/35568/files#r388034584).
PR Close#35884
Currently the logic that handles ICUs located outside of i18n blocks may throw exceptions at runtime. The problem is caused by the fact that we store incorrect TNode index for previous TNode (index that includes HEADER_OFFSET) and do not store a flag whether this TNode is a parent or a sibling node. As a result, the logic that assembles the final output uses incorrect TNodes and in some cases throws exceptions (when incompatible structure is extracted from tView.data due to the incorrect index). This commit adjusts the index and captures whether TNode is a parent to make sure underlying logic manipulates correct TNode.
PR Close#35347
Root cause is that for perf reasons we cache `LFrame` so that we don't have to allocate it all the time. To be extra fast we clear the `LFrame` on `enterView()` rather that on `leaveView()`. The implication of this strategy is that the deepest `LFrame` will retain objects until the `LFrame` allocation depth matches the deepest object.
The fix is to simply clear the `LFrame` on `leaveView()` rather then on `enterView()`
Fix#35148
PR Close#35156
Prior to this change, element namespace was not set for host elements of dynamically created components that resulted in incorrect rendering in a browser. This commit adds the logic to pick and set correct namespace for host element when component is created dynamically.
PR Close#35136
- Adds `TView` into `LFrame`, read the `TView` from `LView` on `enterView`.
- Before this change the `TView` was ofter looked up from `LView` as `lView[TVIEW]`. This is suboptimal since reading from an Array, requires that the read checks array size before the read. This means that such a read has a much higher cost than reading from the property directly. By passing in the `TView` explicitly it makes the code more explicit and faster.
- Some rearrangements of arguments so that `TView` would come before `LView` for consistency.
PR Close#35069
This change changes the priority order of static styling.
Current priority:
```
(least priority)
- Static
- Component
- Directives
- Template
- Dynamic Binding
- Component
- Map/Interpolation
- Property
- Directives
- Map/Interpolation
- Property
- Template
- Map/Interpolation
- Property
(highest priority)
```
The issue with the above priority is this use case:
```
<div style="color: red;" directive-which-sets-color-blue>
```
In the above case the directive will win and the resulting color will be `blue`. However a small change of adding interpolation to the example like so. (Style interpolation is coming in https://github.com/angular/angular/pull/34202)
```
<div style="color: red; width: {{exp}}px" directive-which-sets-color-blue>
```
Changes the priority from static binding to interpolated binding which means now the resulting color is `red`. It is very surprising that adding an unrelated interpolation and style can change the `color` which was not changed. To fix that we need to make sure that the static values are associated with priority of the source (directive or template) where they were declared. The new resulting priority is:
```
(least priority)
- Component
- Static
- Map/Interpolation
- Property
- Directives
- Static
- Map/Interpolation
- Property
- Template
- Static
- Map/Interpolation
- Property
(highest priority)
```
PR Close#34938
Previously we would write to class/style as strings `element.className` and `element.style.cssText`. Turns out that approach is good for initial render but not good for updates. Updates using this approach are problematic because we have to check to see if there was an out of bound write to style and than perform reconciliation. This also requires the browser to bring up CSS parser which is expensive.
Another problem with old approach is that we had to queue the DOM writes and flush them twice. Once on element advance instruction and once in `hostBindings`. The double flushing is expensive but it also means that a directive can observe that styles are not yet written (they are written after directive executes.)
The new approach uses `element.classList.add/remove` and `element.style.setProperty/removeProperty` API for updates only (it continues to use `element.className` and `element.style.cssText` for initial render as it is cheaper.) The other change is that the styling changes are applied immediately (no queueing). This means that it is the instruction which computes priority. In some circumstances it may result in intermediate writes which are than overwritten with new value. (This should be rare)
Overall this change deletes most of the previous code and replaces it with new simplified implement. The simplification results in code savings.
PR Close#34804
NOTE: This change must be reverted with previous deletes so that it code remains in build-able state.
This change deletes old styling code and replaces it with a simplified styling algorithm.
The mental model for the new algorithm is:
- Create a linked list of styling bindings in the order of priority. All styling bindings ere executed in compiled order and than a linked list of bindings is created in priority order.
- Flush the style bindings at the end of `advance()` instruction. This implies that there are two flush events. One at the end of template `advance` instruction in the template. Second one at the end of `hostBindings` `advance` instruction when processing host bindings (if any).
- Each binding instructions effectively updates the string to represent the string at that location. Because most of the bindings are additive, this is a cheap strategy in most cases. In rare cases the strategy requires removing tokens from the styling up to this point. (We expect that to be rare case)S Because, the bindings are presorted in the order of priority, it is safe to resume the processing of the concatenated string from the last change binding.
PR Close#34616
NOTE: This change deletes code and creates a BROKEN SHA. If reverting this SHA needs to be reverted with the next SHA to get back into a valid state.
PR Close#34616
Includes a few minor performance improvements:
* In the `nextContext` instruction we assign a new LView to the `LFrame.contextLView` and then we immediately look it up to get its context. We don't need to do that since we know the view that was assigned already.
* Removes the default value for the `level` parameter of `nextContextImpl` because it generates more code in es5 and is internal-only.
* Removes the default parameter from `setActiveHostElement` since it generates extra code and it's an internal function.
* Makes a check in `setElementExitFn` more strict since we're guaranteed for the value to match the type.
PR Close#34183
`bindingIndex` stores the current location of the bindings in the
template function. Because it used to be stored in `LView` that `LView`
was not reentrant. This could happen if a binding was a getter and had
a side-effect of calling `detectChanges()`.
By moving the `bindingIndex` to `LFrame` where all of the global state
is kept in reentrant way we correct the issue.
PR Close#33235
`LFrame` stores information specifice to the current `LView` As the code
enters and leaves `LView`s we use `enterView()` and `leaveView()`
respectively to build a a stack of `LFrame`s. This allows us to easily
restore the previous `LView` instruction state.
PR Close#33178
Turns out that writing to global state is more expensive than writing to
a property on an object.
Slower:
````
let count = 0;
function increment() {
count++;
}
```
Faster:
````
const state = {
count: 0
};
function increment() {
state.count++;
}
```
This change moves all of the instruction state into a single state object.
`noop_change_detection` benchmark
Pre refactoring: 16.7 us
Post refactoring: 14.523 us (-13.3%)
PR Close#33093
Prior to this patch, if a map-class binding is applied directly then
that value will be incorrectly provided a sanitizer even if there is no
sanitization present for an element.
PR Close#33154
Prior to this patch, each time `advance()` would run (or when a
templateFn or hostBindings code exits) then the core change detection
code would check to see whether the styling data needs to be reset. This
patch removes that functionality and places everything inside of the
scheduled styling exit function. This means that each time one or more
styling bindings run (even if the value hasn't changed) then an exit
function will be scheduled and that will do all the cleanup.
PR Close#32591
This patch is a final major refactor in styling Angular.
This PR includes three main fixes:
All temporary state taht is persisted between template style/class application
and style/class application in host bindings is now removed.
Removes the styling() and stylingApply() instructions.
Introduces a "direct apply" mode that is used apply prop-based
style/class in the event that there are no map-based bindings as
well as property collisions.
PR Close#32259
PR Close#32591
This patch is a final major refactor in styling Angular.
This PR includes three main fixes:
All temporary state taht is persisted between template style/class application
and style/class application in host bindings is now removed.
Removes the styling() and stylingApply() instructions.
Introduces a "direct apply" mode that is used apply prop-based
style/class in the event that there are no map-based bindings as
well as property collisions.
PR Close#32259
PR Close#32596
This patch is a final major refactor in styling Angular.
This PR includes three main fixes:
All temporary state taht is persisted between template style/class application
and style/class application in host bindings is now removed.
Removes the styling() and stylingApply() instructions.
Introduces a "direct apply" mode that is used apply prop-based
style/class in the event that there are no map-based bindings as
well as property collisions.
PR Close#32259
After a series of recent refactorings `enterView` and `leaveView` became
identical. This PR merges both into one concept of view selectio (similar
to a node selection). This reduces number of concepts and code size.
PR Close#32263
This commit removes all the (duplicated) logic of setting lView[BINDING_INDEX]
from `enterView`. `enterView` is on the critcal path perf-wise so we should
avoid having any logic in there and minimise memory read / write.
This simple refactoring in this PR reduces time spent in noop change detection
by ~12% (from ~800ms down to ~700ms on a local machine where measurements were
taken).
PR Close#32263
In the previous patch () all the existing styling code was turned
off in favor of using the new refactored ivy styling code. This
patch is a follow up patch to that and removes all old, unused
styling code from the render3 directory.
PR Close#31193
This commit is the final patch of the ivy styling algorithm refactor.
This patch swaps functionality from the old styling mechanism to the
new refactored code by changing the instruction code the compiler
generates and by pointing the runtime instruction code to the new
styling algorithm.
PR Close#30742
Currently in Ivy whenever we encounter a new namespace, we set it in the global state so that all subsequent nodes are created under the same namespace. Next time a template is run the namespace will be reset back to HTML.
This breaks down if the last node that was rendered was under the SVG or MathML namespace and we create a component through `ViewContainerRef.create`, because the next template function hasn't run yet and it hasn't had the chance to update the namespace. The result is that the root node of the new component will retain the wrong namespace and may not end up rendering at all (e.g. if we're trying to show a `div` inside the SVG namespace). This issue has the potential to affect a lot of apps, because all components inserted through the router also go through `ViewContainerRef.create`.
PR Close#31232
The Angular runtime frequently calls into user code (for example, when
writing to a property binding). Since user code can throw errors, calls to
it are frequently wrapped in a try-finally block. In Ivy, the following
pattern is common:
```typescript
enterView();
try {
callUserCode();
} finally {
leaveView();
}
```
This has a significant problem, however: `leaveView` has a side effect: it
calls any pending lifecycle hooks that might've been scheduled during the
current round of change detection. Generally it's a bad idea to run
lifecycle hooks after the application has crashed. The application is in an
inconsistent state - directives may not be instantiated fully, queries may
not be resolved, bindings may not have been applied, etc. Invariants that
the app code relies upon may not hold. Further crashes or broken behavior
are likely.
Frequently, lifecycle hooks are used to make assertions about these
invariants. When these assertions fail, they will throw and "swallow" the
original error, making debugging of the problem much more difficult.
This commit modifies `leaveView` to understand whether the application is
currently crashing, via a parameter `safeToRunHooks`. This parameter is set
by modifying the above pattern:
```typescript
enterView();
let safeToRunHooks = false;
try {
callUserCode();
safeToRunHooks = true;
} finally {
leaveView(..., safeToRunHooks);
}
```
If `callUserCode` crashes, then `safeToRunHooks` will never be set to `true`
and `leaveView` won't call any further user code. The original error will
then propagate back up the stack and be reported correctly. A test is added
to verify this behavior.
PR Close#31244
There is an encoding issue with using delta `Δ`, where the browser will attempt to detect the file encoding if the character set is not explicitly declared on a `<script/>` tag, and Chrome will find the `Δ` character and decide it is window-1252 encoding, which misinterprets the `Δ` character to be some other character that is not a valid JS identifier character
So back to the frog eyes we go.
```
__
/ɵɵ\
( -- ) - I am ineffable. I am forever.
_/ \_
/ \ / \
== == ==
```
PR Close#30546
This is the first refactor PR designed to change how styling bindings
(i.e. `[style]` and `[class]`) behave in Ivy. Instead of having a heavy
element-by-element context be generated for each element, this new
refactor aims to use a single context for each `tNode` element that is
examined and iterated over when styling values are to be applied to the
element.
This patch brings this new functionality to prop-based bindings such as
`[style.prop]` and `[class.name]`.
PR Close#30469
This patch removes all host-specific styling instructions in favor of
using element-level instructions instead. Because of the previous
patches that made sure `select(n)` worked between styling calls, all
host level instructions are not needed anymore. This patch changes each
of those instruction calls to use any of the `elementStyling*`,
`elementStyle*` and `elementClass*` styling instructions instead.
PR Close#30336
Because the styling context may be stored in a different location
and be apart of a sub array, reading the styling context each time
a host binding is evaluated is costly. This patch ensures that the
active styling context is cached so that multiple interactions with
styling bindings can easily retrieve the styling context efficiently.
PR Close#29818
The `Δ` caused issue with other infrastructure, and we are temporarily
changing it to `ɵɵ`.
This commit also patches ts_api_guardian_test and AIO to understand `ɵɵ`.
PR Close#29850
- Removes `@publicApi` annotation from ivy instructions
- Adds new `@codeGenApi` annotation to ivy instructions
- Updates ts_api_guardian to support the new annotation properly
PR Close#29820
The new styling algorithm in angular is designed to evaluate host
bindings stylinh priority in order of directive evaluation order. This,
however, does not work with respect to parent/sub-class directives
because sub-class host bindings are run after the parent host bindings
but still have priority. This patch ensures that the host styling bindings
for parent and sub-class components/directives are executed with respect
to the styling algorithm prioritization.
Jira Issue: FW-1132
PR Close#29602
- moves all publicly exported instructions to their own files
- refactors namespace instructions to set state in `state.ts`
- no longer exports * from `instructions.ts`.
- `instructions.ts` renamed to `shared.ts` (old `shared.ts` contents folded in to `instructions.ts`)
- updates `all.ts` to re-export from public instruction files.
PR Close#29646
- Adds `property` instruction
- Does _NOT_ add compiler changes to accommodate `property` instruction, that will be a follow up PR.
- Updates `select` instruction to set the selected index in state.
- Adds dev mode assertions around the selected index state.
Related #29527
PR Close#29513
- Adds `property` instruction
- Does _NOT_ add compiler changes to accommodate `property` instruction, that will be a follow up PR.
- Updates `select` instruction to set the selected index in state.
- Adds dev mode assertions around the selected index state.
Related #29527
PR Close#29513
